Thursday, August 25, 2016

Imposing Liberty

When I first introduced this concept, it was met with ridicule, I mean, how could one impose liberty on another?  Is that not a violation of liberty itself, to force it on someone else?


Well, we are accustomed to the imposition of laws against liberty.  That is our linear thought process.  It fits well with the mood of the day.  But the only way to enjoy liberty is to impose it.  Walk away from that responsibility and it is lost.  This is where we are today.  Too many of those who value liberty see it as something they obtain for themselves and who cares about everyone else, but eventually, they are surrounded by those who were left to gain more liberty for themselves by restricting the liberty of others.


We see this every day.  An IRS agent can basically do, say and attest to whatever they want and the people, the individuals, are left to pay whatever it is that the IRS agent came up with.  There is no retribution when they are wrong, no punishment for putting people through living hell.  Do you think he does not understand that his liberty is greatly advanced by the rules as they exist, by the regulations that have been drafted?


Have we learned nothing?  Being left alone is never what it seems.  Being able to enjoy liberty is only a temporary condition that has been well fought for and imposed on the rest of society, through denial of government programs.  The first thing a government has to do in order to supply someone else with benefits is to take it from another.  Eventually, those in government who supply the benefits through programs and those who receive those benefits outnumber and out power those who, out of a Christian sense of charity, agreed to help those less fortunate.  By then, it is all turned around on the one who just wanted to be left alone to do business and make a profit.  Suddenly, they are the detestable hoards who will not give MORE.  Maybe a visit by the IRS will improve their point of view.  Maybe, a few new regulations will alert them to their precarious position in this new parasitic society.


The one thing one might always count on is that those in need, of some kind, will always outnumber those who have what they need.  In the parasitic society, those who have diligently produced income, profit and capital are food. 


There will come a time, perhaps soon, when the parasites of all sorts, destroy this nation and leave it open to invaders, to internal enemies dedicated to the collectivist system, to gangs and other relatively organized mobs, who, like scavengers pick the bones clean.  Whatever voices of liberty remain, if any, must battle these odds to relight that torch.


I suggest, when we rebuild this society after the parasites have decimated everything within their reach, killed each other and submitted to our foreign enemies that we take this lesson and impose liberty on every single one of them.  It is the only way to defend our own.


Charity is rightfully the Christian way and should remain there.  It should be important to us as believers, it should be our driving force, but it should never be put in the hands of bureaucrats.




Monday, August 22, 2016

The Screaming of the Barbarians

There is no explaining the events of the past several years.  When one considers the impossibility of current events, it only makes sense when confronted with the fact that a hostile and aggressive form of totalitarianism is afoot.  It is intentionally confusing and contradictory, pushing rational thought into a blind alley.


One finds oneself asking impossible questions: Why would feminists remain silent while the promotion and importation of anti-feminists known for the most severe forms of oppression goes on at an accelerated pace?  Why would homosexuals support the administration's full-throated support of regimes that routinely imprison, burn and toss homosexuals off of buildings?  Why would a president encourage the division of the races, inflaming old hatreds and new resentments with the potential to cause massive civil slaughter otherwise only known to places like Rwanda?  Why would the media assail and seek the punishment of a lying Olympic swimmer, yet defend with screaming silence the multitude of lies told by a presidential candidate, knowing all the while that her lies are exponentially more dangerous to individuals and society? 


Why, why, why?


The only answer possible is that it is a multi-frontal assault on peace.  It is an attempt to do exactly what it is doing, keeping the public off balance with daily insults to rational thought.  The people start to understand the connection of the president to the jihadists and Black Lives Matter encourages the burning of the suburbs.  The people start to understand the Democratic strategy of importing illegal voters and the president demands that transsexuals use any restroom they want. 


The only option is to avoid taking the bait of trying to figure it out.  Since the answer is a coordinated strategy to destabilize the United States and prepare it for one final revelation, skip to that conclusion and avoid the brain damage.  In trying to make all of the connections from one corrupt and diseased foundation to a political figure and declaring it illegal, one is just doing the work of the totalitarians.  Using good brain cells to find the entrance to the hamster's exercise wheel is counter-productive.


Yes, they are evil and devious enough to foment a race war to destabilize American society.  Yes, they are evil and devious enough to expose our children to pedophiles lurking in bathrooms, pretending to be sexually indeterminate.  Yes, they are evil and devious enough to import terrorists under the guise of humanitarianism to randomly commit acts of terror to frighten and disrupt society.  Yes, they are evil and devious enough to encourage racial animosity on the southern border for all of the reasons above.


It does no good to spend valuable time and energy trying to expose these acts.  They are doing it, they know what they are doing and those remaining on their side of the argument are anxious to see them succeed.  Time and energy would much better be spent preparing to defend oneself and their kin from the final revelation.  Your outrage is useless unless it is turned inward and used to bolster resolve.  Stop fighting every skirmish and prepare for the war.


Do not allow yourself to see these individual assaults as the battle.  They are probing tactics.  They are diversionary tactics.  They are designed to keep the enemy (you) off balance and blasting away at every snap of a twig.  Yes, these tactics are revolting, disgusting and insulting.  They are playing on your patriotism and your sense of decency.  They, these forces of totalitarianism, are trying to keep you outraged and swinging at shadows.  What they do not want you to do is to dismiss all of this as the screaming of the barbarians designed to intimidate the opposing forces.


The idea is to mark each insult and repugnant violation of decency and rationality as yard markers on the battlefield.  They are getting closer and closer so the only rational reaction is to sharpen the blades and load the rifles and wait to see the whites of their eyes.

Monday, August 15, 2016

There Is A Line

There is a war being waged in America, but only one side is fighting.  The progressives, or Marxists, or outright Communists have been waging war against middle America, using every diabolical means available, for decades, perhaps a century, but middle America is too busy just trying to survive to bother with them.  Like the day when Barack Obama declared ISIS to be the Junior Varsity team, middle America considers this war being waged on them as insignificant to their lives, too distant and too petty.  Yes, some useless and pathetic residual guilt is responsible for some of their acquiescence.


Yet, the Marxists have taken ground steadily, pushing and shoving against the pillars of traditional American culture until they have begun to rattle the foundations.  Still, middle America shrugs at these advancements, hopefully ignoring them, waiting for something to cause the Marxists to give up.  But, they will never give up.  They are not stronger than middle America, but they are more persistent and right now, they are aided by every structure of government, the media, entertainment, sports figures, or so it seems.  We will never really know the truth, because we get information from the media and they are liars.


The media covers up for crimes, preferring the lies of omission to the truth of objective reporting.  That is all really up to them, but they have become nothing other than Baghdad Bob, who proclaimed to Iraqi television that there was nothing amiss in Baghdad while American tanks rolled in the street behind him.  That is our media today and like Baghdad Bob, they are covering for their leaders: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.  They sound as ridiculous as he did and are as transparent.


In decades hence, the media will be forced to wear the shame they should feel today, but that is another post for another day.


The crowds in the streets of Milwaukee are not their own masters at it might seem to them.  They are foot soldiers in a bigger battle.  The Marxists came for Russia and China, what reason would they have to bypass America?  How?  Through convincing the discontented that they could get satisfaction by attacking the enemies of the masters.  Time after time, place after place, it was all the same.  Barack Obama, perhaps the most notable Marxist of our time, with the background to prove it, is pulling all the strings.  It was clear when his Attorney General made it clear that the Obama Administration would stand behind Black Lives Matter no matter what.  That was the signal, in front of the whole nation that the administration was with them. 


So, this is what the Marxists want: America.  They will use Muslim jihadists; they will use discontented minorities from the inner cities; they will use IRS agents; they will use the power of the United States government; they will use the media; they will use sports figures; they will use relatives within the family. 


We are about to see the masks come off.  That is what this is all about, all of this unrest, all of these riots.  It is time for them to show middle America what progress they have made over the past century.  Of course, they have to make a serious push to get our guns, first.  They have to disarm the populace they intend to enslave.  Then they will offer the chance to live our lives as before, watching television, texting, facebooking, etc, all under the new standards and rules of communication, you understand.


There is a line where middle America figures it out and begins to fight back.  I don't know where that is, but it is there.  We saw it on 9/12, however fleeting it might have been.  Perhaps it is when they realize that their children will be beaten and killed to satisfy the bloodlust of a tyrant.  All I know is, if they do not see the line by then, it is because they are on the wrong side of it. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

A Second Amendment Supporter's Response To Hillary

Hillary Clinton suggested that there was something inherently violent about Second Amendment activists. In response to Donald Trump's comments that the Second Amendment supporters might have something to say about Hillary's election as president, Hillary suggested that his remarks were a violent innuendo.


I take great offense to Hillary's remarks.  It shows her lack of sensitivity to the Constitution and supporters of the Second Amendment.  Her offhand stereotypical statement makes it clear that she, like many of her liberal supporters, have a preconceived notion (in other words: prejudice) against gun owners, despite the fact that gun owners might be liberal or conservative. After the Orlando massacre many from the LGBT community lined up to purchase weapons.  A gun does not choose it's owner, it is the other way around and many of those choosing to arm themselves in a more dangerous environment since the terrorist attacks that have taken place in America as a result of Obama's policies, are liberal.


Hillary's mistake is in believing that Second Amendment supporters look to their weapons as answers to political problems and yet that has NEVER happened, not in the long line of injustices and infringements endured by the Second Amendment crowd.  They do not protest.  They do not threaten violence as the liberals generally do.  They do not call for the murder of policemen, because they feel an injustice when a criminal is killed by police.  Not even when Philando Castile, an innocent man and a concealed carry permit holder, was shot down by police.


Today, in New Mexico, a bread truck driver who was being robbed of goods, informed the thief that he was a concealed carry weapons holder and to desist.  The thief continued to loot the vehicle and the driver fired his firearm, not killing the thief, but wounding him in the leg.  The thief was taken to the hospital and the driver was not charged.  This is how responsible gun owners help to stop crime and prevent millions of other crimes that would have been committed had the perpetrators not turned and left when being informed of the presence of the weapon. This is just one instance of such heroism on the very day I wrote this article.  I bet it happens several times a day all over America, but the press won't report this sort of logical and prudent use of a firearm, because they are dishonest and all too willing to commit LIES OF OMISSION.


The society Hillary Clinton prefers is one where all citizens are victims and the wanton crime calls for more police and bigger departments, who (thanks to George Bush and Barack Obama) fall ultimately under the control of the Department of Homeland Security.


But, what Hillary Should keep in mind is that infringing a right that "shall not be infringed" and eliminating that right are two entirely different things. It doesn't matter how many liberal justices she appoints to the Supreme Court, one does not need to be a lawyer to understand the violation of one's rights. 


There is a point, I suppose, when the ballot box has failed and the United States Government is in the hands of a known (if not convicted) felon and the lawlessness of the government has gone so far as to inspire the words of our founding fathers as a new rally cry to "alter or abolish" that we, Second Amendment supporters begin to see that the only option available is to do just that.


Mrs. Clinton, we are not the unorganized rabble that Black Lives Matter is (depending on what the definition of "is" is.  We are not the untrained and unprepared fools who feel they have to go out and pound their chests and scream horrible epithets at their opposition.  When it is time to push our political advantage (and it is a considerable advantage, including some police officers) you will know it and you will feel the heat of our political fire.  Whether that ever comes down to a full-blown revolution, is strictly up to you. 

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Serfs With Guns

This nation is the result of politicians being tolerated by the populace.  It is the result of economics being delegated to the bankers.  It is the result of bureaucrats (apparatchiks) running wild with regulations that amount to laws enforced at the point of a gun or the threat of prison.  It is the result of thinking that a fifteen minute investment (to vote) once every couple of years is enough to keep a handle on all of the children in government.  It is the equivalent of thinking one might raise a child with a weekend every couple of years.  Logically, we all know that won't work, but when it comes to government, we accept it, believe in it, consider it the most important thing we do and it means exactly nothing. 


In truth, we, the governed, are tolerated by the politicians.  In any other system, they would have just rounded up the trouble-makers and lined them up along a pit.  Don't think they wouldn't like to do just that, but they are biding their time.  A republic is too unwieldy, with serfs believing they are princes and princes believing they are kings.  To really have control, the politicians need a different system.


The new system is in the works.  That's what public education has been about since the 60's, it is what Black Lives Matter is all about and why the politicians support it.  It is what judicial activism is all about.  It is what political correctness is all about.  Political correctness is the language of genocide, it is the way to separate "good" people from "bad" people and to reduce humans to categories. From there, the pits can be dug and the defectives identified.


I have lately been promoting the idea of Patcons to help make the necessary links, to encourage the development of Community Defense Teams.  Some groups are ahead of others, but everyone I have contacted understand the need to coalesce, not just for survival, but like the group out in Wet Mountain Valley, CO, to push outward with the message of liberty.  The Appalachian Redoubt is on a par with Wet Mountain, but there are a lot of empty spaces. 


This push for Patcons and Community Defense Teams is in direct response to the insane politics of the day.  Barack Obama comes out and criticizes the Republicans for Donald Trump with all of the irony only a backer of Hillary Clinton could muster. 


I spoke with a person the other day about the nation as it stands, someone who was vested in the political system and he asked my position.  I told him that I simply didn't consider it relevant.  "We die fast, or we die slow." There is no option that offers salvation.  No election in my lifetime has so accurately defined the state of the nation as Trump v Clinton.


So, if this is where we are, what can possibly be next?  Bernie Sanders illuminated the otherwise darkened corner of the die-hard communists, who have receded into the shadows since the demise of the Soviet Union, but they were always there.  Black Lives Matter has illuminated the racist hatred of the collectivists in the black community.  Trump has put the lie to the Republican Party and exposed it as the slightly less collectivist party.


That leaves many of us as just serfs with guns, the one constituency no one really wants to take head-on.  So, they will come through the courts and through definitions to put the "bad" person tag on all of us.  The headline over at Western Rifle Shooters puts it perfectly: You Will Be Considered and Treated As A Felon: Act Accordingly.


It is a fight, now. When they finally destroy everything valuable in this nation, the finger pointing will start.  You have already seen how that plays out, they are responsible for nothing; we are responsible for everything.  They will hunt us down and kill us to hear the cheering rise from the throats of their sycophants.     


Sunday, July 31, 2016

Southwest Patcon

The idea of a Patcon is important.  The further down the road we go toward chaos, the more important the idea of holding a Patcon becomes.  But, I have been surprised at the lack of understanding of what a Patcon means and what it is supposed to accomplish.


I am attempting to put together a Southwest Patcon, but I need someone to help out with a location, preferably in New Mexico.  It should be private property.  But in attempting to arrange this Patcon, I have run into opinions and attitudes that have revealed the fact that most people don't really understand the definition or purpose of Patcons.


Patcons are a term that myself and Bill Nye came up with for Patriot Conference or Patriot Convention, either/or, it doesn't really matter what the etymology of the word is, the purpose is to gather as patriots to the Constitution, Second Amendment activists, or Three Percenters, to establish connections in your local area and to share knowledge and receive training in either tactics or communications.


The one thing we can all agree on is there is a crisis coming.  Whether that is a crisis of culture, of politics, of economics or all three at once, it is coming and those most prepared to not only defend themselves, but their community against those who would harm it are ahead of the game.


Patcons are designed to bring like-minded people together to discuss, plan and educate themselves on methods that will ensure that when the dust settles, there are people alive who understand the value of the Constitutional protections of rights and who are capable and willing to defend these rights against whoever might want to subvert them for their own purposes. 


Everything in modern American culture has been subverted in order to deny these rights.  The government views individual rights as detrimental to their goals and objectives.  As they have worked to deny these rights to advance their collectivist agenda, it has become more important for individuals to secure these rights through active implementation.


Open carry events are an example of this tactic.  When a group of individuals demonstrate their rights by carrying weapons openly as allowed by law and right, they establish those rights both in culture and in law.  Otherwise, it is easy for government agencies to treat open carry as a violation of law, even if they cannot point to a law that if violates. 


Patcons are an expression of the same thing.  They establish the rights of individuals who carry weapons openly to gather and discuss the methods of self-defense against threats that might endanger themselves or their communities.


The true fact is that when there is a period of economic, political or cultural chaos, the police are likely to be protecting their own families rather than everyone else's.  The recent events in Dallas and Baton Rouge are examples.  After police officers were ambushed and executed by individuals connected in one way or the other with Black Lives Matter, police forces across the nation were subjected to numerous filings for retirement.  Police officers decided that their lives were more important that civil defense.  That is a logical response and one that should be anticipated during a period of chaos.


Establishing a community defense team or CDT, as many of those who have participated in Patcons have done, is an important step in not only defending loved ones, but the political principles of liberty and freedom.


Due to positive responses received when I first suggested a Southwest Patcon, I am encouraged to openly search for someone willing to provide the property on which such a Patcon might be held.  Since many of those who might attend would be looking to camp out at the site, a certain amount of private property would be useful.  It should be close to other amenities where people might stay who do not plan to camp out. 


If I can secure a location, I will do the work of ensuring certain accommodations necessary to the event, including some training opportunities.  I will dedicate funds to make sure the event is of use and value to all who attend. 


Please respond to tl@tldavis.com

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

The Last American Presidential Election

It should be obvious to anyone now that this will be the last presidential election in America as it exists.  With Republicans voting to nominate a non Republican as a middle finger to the GOP establishment, who, after the 2014 election gave the middle finger to their own political base and the Democrats so utterly bankrupt as to nominate someone who should be in prison the bloom is off the rose.


There is no hiding it now.  These are two political parties in the process of self-destruction.  In an effort to win political power they have created impossible and conflicting constituencies.  To the political observer it is amusing and would be hilarious were it not for the dire consequences to society as a whole.


It is a political season that encouraged Bernie the socialist to develop a proletariat army, demanding socialism at any cost.  It has exposed the media as the party hacks they have always been and there is more exposure to come as the media, not Hillary, is the real target of Donald Trump, but he is savvy enough to implicate and indict both.


The Democratic convention is nothing more than a rally cry for communism, complete with the hammer and sickle flag waving in the crowd.


Most by now should realize they are being asked a question: Which side are you on?  Some will not understand the question, but enough will and whoever wins, wins nothing, but a nation at war with itself.  This is not so much a civil war as it is a cultural free for all.  A no-holds-barred wrestling match in the streets of America.


Black Lives Matter has empowered the harshest racists to step into the spotlight and proclaim hatred as their creed, as evil and ignorant as the KKK ever was.  This is the banner and the message of the Communist/Democrat Party. The Palestinian Flag-waving anti-Semites step to the fore.  They have been accustomed to persecuting the Christians and now they have decided to branch out with their hatred for anything traditionally American.  Yes, they hate America, so much so that until shamed into it, did not even produce a single American flag at the Democratic Convention.


So, we know the communists in the Democratic party hate America while asking Americans for their vote, so the vote is clearly permission to do what any good communist nation would do, destroy America.  They speak of doing away with what is left of the Constitution with relish.  They hate America and detest the document that founded it.  How else are we supposed to interpret their ultimate victory other than as open hostility to the founding?


With this understanding, is that not the long-anticipated moment of insurgency? Is that not the moment when the battle lines are clear?


Electing Trump is a different answer to the same question.  Is that it?  This is who we have as a president?  Does he even have any leanings toward conservatism or the Constitution?  No, not really.  Donald saw what Barack Obama was able to do and is a little envious of that sort of power.  Do we get soda size legislation?  Or game show policy?


No matter who wins, or even if there is no election at all due to martial law, it is over.  It is the moment when the vast majority of Americans realize what many of us have known for a long time, that the United States is dead and it's time for the next system to rise.  By the end of this election, the question will be unmistakably asked and answered.  

Monday, July 18, 2016

Going There

We need blind justice, not a blind press.  A lot has been made of race lately. But no one wants to speak the truth.  Truth is not a profitable commodity in the race issue.  Whites are supposed to accept a subordinate role due to the guilt that they are supposed to carry for slavery, but no where do blacks recognize that many whites died in the Civil War fighting for the North against the Democrats of the South, that actually few ever owned slaves, that many of the whites they blame for slavery did not have family members arrive in the country until after the Civil War and actually didn't arrive in America until the Industrial Revolution.  But, those are facts that blacks in the Black Lives Matter crowd don't want to know.


Whites, think they have come a long way from the days when they casually said "nigger rigged" or that guy has a "nigger knob" on his steering wheel.  Never mind that these terms were not even associated with blacks, they were just what things were called, but those who first used those terms were racists, were vile and whites learned them from their parents and they respected their parents, so they didn't see anything racist about it, but they do now.


The problem is, we, as a nation, can never get past this issue of racism without some honesty on both sides, but there is no advantage for either white or black to actually look at the issue from a common understanding that what someone's parents did has no bearing on their lives or their pain.


There is racism and a lot of it is white on black racism, but the most disgusting and disturbing examples of racism that come to my white mind are those of blacks.  I dare the media to read any major speech about race from a black perspective and substitute the word "black" or "nigger" for "white" or "cracker" and not come up with the understanding of the racism of the speech.


One cannot solve racism with more racism.  Racism does not have a color.  Even if you take whites out of the racist issue, there is still the issue of racist comments about blacks from Hispanics, or Asians and vice-versa, vice-versa.  The outcome is that whites, by nature of their color alone, are not allowed to speak of race.  That, in itself, is racist.  But, no one wants to hear that.


The media doesn't want to hear it, the president certainly doesn't want to hear it, blacks don't want to hear it and whites don't even want to have the conversation, because it could cost their job, their career, their standing in the community, their friendships and perhaps even their marriages.  But, this is something blacks might want to understand.  A white person could lose everything they have worked for just by talking about these issues.  Perhaps they are not eloquent and only the eloquent can even attempt such a discourse.


There are a lot of whites I know, who are racist.  I don't have a problem making that statement.  I only hesitate to make that statement, because I know that my black counterpart will not admit that they also know a lot of blacks who are racist.  They don't even recognize the rhetoric they hear every day as racist, but it is often appallingly so.


There is no way to come to a common ground on a cliff.


I have had many discussions on race with blacks I have met, but it hardly ever comes down to a discussion of skin color, rather it deals with being raised "right" by our parents and by "right" I mean respectful to all people, kind and polite to all strangers of whatever color.  I admire a lot about blacks and Hispanics and Asians.  I also respect a lot about the French, the Italians, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Fillipinos and on and on, because I respect heritage.  It is only MY heritage that is deemed cruel and vicious.  So, how do we start a conversation based on that premise?


But, where I lose respect is where blacks pull out that Black Lives Matter card and try to play it.  Every one of the people in this country have been dealt a crappy deal at one point or another.  Blacks don't like to recognize that there was a time when Southern plantation owners used to hire the Irish by the day to do all of the really dangerous jobs on the farm, so they didn't have to risk a substantial financial investment in order to get a dangerous job done.  That may be cold-hearted, but it does not make the Irish feel any better about it, because blacks have the superior moral authority in the example.


I am only able to write this, because I have never cared what color a person was.  I recoil from a rough-looking white dude roaming my neighborhood much more than I ever would a nicely dressed black man.  It is not the color that this the threat, it is the poverty, because poverty breeds desperation and people of every color are likely to do something bad when they are desperate.


The brilliance of capitalism is that it is designed, whether intentionally or not, to remove desperation from the equation of human interaction and thus the greatest weapon against racism.  But the Marxists need the conflict and so detest capitalism as it is capable of removing the desperation that is so handy when it comes to political activism.  Everywhere you see a Marxist, you see protests, social unrest, discontent, envy, grievances and dysfunction.  It is not a coincidence, it is how they motivate people to join their cause.


If the black population would just once denounce their Marxist ties and latch onto the principles of capitalism, they would be shocked at the welcome they would receive from those of us daily engaged in the struggle for self-sufficiency and self-reliance.  There are many great examples of black capitalism that have honored the nation with their success, but the Marxists won't have it and label them "Uncle Toms."  And, when they do, I shake my head, another generation of brilliant black minds lost to the old and decrepit ideology.


But, if you think you are going to classify me along with every cracker you have met over the past fifty years and stick us all in the same basket, then no, I have no respect for you and will like likely meet you on the battlefield.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

The Moment of Legend

There are moments of legend and those legends produce a cause around which to rally.  These are things that create political leverage at the higher levels of society, where rulers reign. One of these legends in our past is the victory at Yorktown by General Washington and French allies.  But, this is all being erased by indoctrination in public schools.  In fact, everything admirable about the current system is being undermined with the intent to set the minds right of the populace in order to introduce a "new" system that, like Obamacare, promises everything, but delivers only control.  The Patriot Act was nothing less than the same thing, so there is no political party to which the citizens can turn to reverse these advances.


In effect, the government at all levels is in the process of turning the people against themselves in order to prepare them for the reinvention they plan.  But, plans are always better on paper than they are in practice and this is the case here.  By attacking their own institutions, they have alerted those willing to consider that their professed intent of "fairness" and "inclusion" are but ruses to distract the masses from their true intent of revolution, not evolution.


The people are being sold the idea of evolution, of becoming more sophisticated, more advanced, more "human" while the real intent is to revert back to ancient concepts of dictatorial government, with the resources of the United States as fuel for their vision.  Once they achieve their goal of total control, the mask can come off.  They, the rulers, need this control for the coming days of economic meltdown.  They need to be able to exterminate anyone who might stand against them, because there is only room for a few at the top and those not "sold" on the vision must be sacrificed in a way that does not alarm the other sheep to a point of panic.


They are completely comfortable with a period of chaos where even millions are eliminated at the hands of their neighbors.  Population reduction is part of the plan and the more that the people take care of themselves reduces the number of tribunals they must conduct to arrive at the same goal. 


The fact is, there is a massive transformation scheduled for whenever the inevitable crisis occurs.  There are ideas that the rulers will try to jumpstart the process through social riots and revolts caused by the government itself during this election season, but it will probably be able to let the chips already precariously balanced, fall when gravity takes over.


The important information to be gleaned from the extensive verbiage above is that they already have a plan.  Do you?  Do you care about the America you have been raised in, or are you willing to chuck it all for the inclusiveness of a transgendered army?  Is it of vital national interest that those defending our nation are liberated to enjoy their own definition of gender identity, or that they are the best trained, best equipped and best prepared to tackle the challenges of a prolonged battle against a foe through asymmetrical warfare?  I am not saying that these two options are mutually exclusive, but the truth is by focusing our military on issues other than the narrow focus of being efficient and destructive killers of our enemies, is detrimental to the mission.


It is time, finally, to recognize the necessity of making the choice for the traditional America, or the new one.  It is time to define those dedicated to the old or the new.  It is time to make the distinction so that the focus of the forces aligned against this new and radical regime become known as such; identifiable to each other.


That distinction is already being made in the political arena in Trump vs Clinton and while these are not exact representations of the ideals in question, they are close enough to make the point, because they define the issue, "Make America great again" or "Transform America into a Sharia-compliant nation." Now, these are not the representatives one might choose around which to rally, but one does not go to battle with the army they wish they had, but rather with the army they actually have. This, Trump, is the general we actually have, not as a presidential candidate so much as an identifiable representative of the ideological ground on which we stand however inaccurate that representation may be.


Understanding that we do not have to even agree with Trump, our purpose is greater than Trump.  He can be and is an unwilling representative of our point of view.  We, if we are smart and not too devoted to our own narrow perspective, are capable of commandeering the message of Trump and making it our own, making it stand for something we understand, but he does not.  Since all of politics at this point is an exercise in manipulation and subterfuge, we should be smart enough to use the Trump campaign to our own advantage, because the alternative is to be overwhelmed by those dedicated to our destruction.


This is the moment of legend.  Do we grasp onto this plan, integrate ourselves into the Trump campaign, confront the enemy on the battlefield of Cleveland, risk it all for one stand against the forces dedicated to the destruction of the Constitutional United States, or do we play it safe and hold out for some miracle that precisely represents our goals?


Consider it, discuss it, understand it, before you reject it out of some party politics nonsense.  That world is gone.  There is no voting our way out of our situation, but there is a means of political influence we might exert, if we are clever, if we know what we are doing and are not afraid to be identified as a "Trumpster" if it suits our goal of disrupting the Marxist steamroller. 


Again, before you go off "half-cocked" I am not suggesting voting for Trump or electing Trump.  I am suggesting using political events as proxies so as to deny the anti-Trump forces their optics of superior numbers.  I am stepping into a leadership role I have long denied in order to encourage those of us who understand the war to engage in a numbers battle, nothing more.  I am suggesting using their weapons against them and using everything possible to our advantage. They want the anti-White, anti-gun, anti-liberty forces to be the dominant optic for their news story, we do not.  It's that simple. 

Thursday, July 14, 2016

That Would Be Excellent

All we need are gun laws like the French!  Isn't that the message we have been fed by all of the leftist Marxists running their mouths for decades?  There would be no terrorist attacks if we just had gun laws like the British, or French.  Bad things never happen in those countries, because they have strict gun laws. Yet, despite those laws, the French have just endured another terrorist attack, with gunshots being heard over and over on the streets of Nice, France. It occurred in Paris not even a year ago.  But, you will hear no French politicians decrying the fact that their gun laws are too lax, that children can get guns easier than books or computers, because that would be a lie and some politicians have some morals about lying when it is obviously a lie, others don't.


Some, like Barack Obama, don't mind lying at all.  They will spit on the graves of dead police officers in order to push a racist agenda.  They will lie about the availability of guns to pass stricter gun laws and they have a hoard of representatives and senators who will do the same and, because of that, they think they are speaking to a sympathetic public, but too many of them know the truth and while they might nod their heads in agreement with every uttered lie, they know that when the chips are down and someone is threatening their children or home, that they would rather have a gun than a promise from someone like them.


What these politicians really despise about the Second Amendment is that they know that it was designed, written and passed with the idea that it would eventually be used to throw people like them out of office.  That it would be used to "alter or abolish" governments, including theirs, that become hostile to the freedom of one to pursue a life they choose; to defend property they rightfully own; and to enjoy those things which are due to a free person, the multitude of things that could not rightfully be delineated in a one-page document.


Back then, there was no need for a longer document.  The freedoms insinuated included almost anything a person might do.  The Fourth Amendment expressly denies the government from being able to search a place without first describing those things and documents to be searched and the items or people to be seized.  After 240 years, the government has found a way around the Fourth Amendment, but they did not find a way around the freedoms that it offers.  So, while legally, they may have found some loop holes that allow them to violate the Fourth Amendment, they did not find a way around the fact that they have become hostile to the right to be free of those searches and seizures and so, have painted themselves as traitors to the founders' intent and made it much more likely that the Second Amendment would be used for its original purpose.


Matt Damon recently remarked that the Second Amendment should be done away with in one fell swoop.  Which, aside from showing a juvenile misunderstanding of the Constitution and what would be needed to "do away" with the Second Amendment, demonstrates the liberal mentality.  Because, I believe that most of us supporters of the Second Amendment would like to see nothing else.  Yes sir, Mr. Damon, give us all the same "start" signal.  That would be excellent.

About Me

My photo
I am a published and produced writer, a novelist, a freelance writer, a playwright and blogger.