Lies of Omission

Saturday, December 3, 2016

A Message From The Crew of Lies Of Omission

I wanted to take a minute to do a little bit of housekeeping on Lies of Omission the film currently being produced by this odd conglomeration of liberty/2nd Amendment/freedomista/III% community, because it is not just myself and Pete who are producing it. This whole community is producing it. It is about the people in this movement, by the people in this movement, largely funded by this movement. To be honest, if this were a money-making scheme and we fancied ourselves as some sort of "film producers" we would not have done this film. Personally, I might have done something like LGBT Gun Nuts or something that would have been able to draw some traditional type funding. I might have done Famous People and Their Weapons of Choice. The truth is, documentaries don't make a heck of a lot of money and unless there are some big names involved or foundations signed on, there is not a lot of money available for them, but does that mean that we must be silent and let Katie Couric tell the tale? Also, the type of documentary we are doing is more expensive than other types.

Here's what I believe: the average person involved in this community is more thoughtful, intelligent, well-read, informed and bright than most of the "leaders" of other communities. We are all individuals, we are all leaders, with our own opinions, ideas and thoughts of how things should be done. The amount of good, reliable information is astounding, whether that be on the subject of bug-out bags, communications or political theory. Unfortunately, that also means that we don't agree on very much, which is what I think makes us strong, until we try to coordinate something.

The original idea for Lies of Omission came from the injustice done to this community by Katie Couric's fraudulent documentary "Under The Gun." What she wanted to do was to go out into OUR community, find some hicks that sounded stupid and put that on film to say: "See, can we really be safe when idiots like these have guns?" But, when she interviewed these people she didn't get what she wanted, so she had to edit it to make them look stupid. She is now being sued by the group she interviewed for $12 million.

Because there are so many smart people in this community, we have gotten some criticisms, which are always appreciated. As a writer, I understand that process and do not take it personally when people tell me I am doing it all wrong. It doesn't mean they are right about that, but there is always some good information passed along in the exchange. First of all, we have been criticized for the way we have done this. Typically, the funds are aggregated before filming starts. I agree with that, but we had to start the project earlier than we wanted to if we were going to include Mike Vanderboegh's point of view and get his story on film. That drove the timeline.

We got a lot of suggestions on who to approach for funding and since they had never asked who we had approached for funding, they didn't realize we had already gone that route, but here is the problem with following all of the advice we have gotten. The more famous the person we approach, the more they expect to be involved in the project. It is the relative anonymity of the people we want in the film that make it more impactful and personal. This is also why we have turned to the community for as much of the budget as we can, to keep it pure.

The one thing this documentary is not, is a hysterical, finger-pointing accusation, it is more of a reasoned, compelling argument for freedom, individual rights and an explanation of how they are disappearing and why they need to be defended. This is a message that the next generation of this battle is not being taught in school and even if it were, it would not be taught by people who truly understand the nuances like this community does. We are seeking a diversity of points of view to help drive the message home so that no matter where the viewer lands on the spectrum of beliefs, they will have a voice and a reason to consider the arguments.

Shortly, we will be going back out to finish the interviews, then we can get started on the most time-consuming and expensive part of the project, editing and post production. We do have some agreements in the works to help with that part of the project. We also have to work on distribution. If we were an established film company, or aspired to such, we might have distribution deals in place, but we don't so that will take some real effort, once we have a completed product.

One more thing I would like to express to the people who have given to this project. We are extremely grateful for the donations we have received, but we consider them a sort of investment in having a voice that is not offered to us, the community, by anyone. There is no spokesman who represents the breadth of our point of view. 12 Round Productions is dedicated to providing a voice, but does not pretend to be a spokesman, because that is not possible with this group.

Friday, December 2, 2016

Let The Games Begin

If you have money in the stock market, it might be too late already. The whole house of cards might be about to collapse. The EU, as an economic experiment in globalization, has been on wobbly legs for some time as evidenced by the recent Brexit movement. The Brits got it right, but the leadership refuses to listen to their own citizens (as all elitists do), because it would signal that globalization is a flawed system. The elitists refuse to acknowledge this simple and obvious fact, because a global economy is necessary to arrive at a global government.

Why would they want a global government? Think of our own nation. We have 50 separate states, but with the increased power and reach of the federal government the anger at local authorities is tempered by the fact that the most onerous and pernicious regulations come from the federal government, keeping revolt at a distance from those who are actually pulling the strings. Imagine this on a global level, some distant, all-powerful government dictating and controlling every human being on the planet, taking control of all the natural resources and meting them out as it chooses, moving people from one area to another to destroy the concept of ownership. It becomes one huge hive of slaves.

That is the elitist image of nirvana and Barack Obama has done his share of prepping the American people for that ultimate end, but the cracks of the initial attempt (the EU) are starting to show. The flaw is in the human being, who is not satisfied with a perpetual condition of poverty and enslavement, even when it is a fairly comfortable existence. Barack Obama was America's globalist and while the American people systematically tried to neuter his power over eight years, there were globalists on the other side of the aisle that prevented any serious threat. It all hinged on the election of Hillary Clinton to continue the process of globalization, but the American people pulled a fast one on the elitists and elected Donald Trump to office. This is not to say that the battle has not moved from the public to the private places in America, behind marbled walls, but the fact is, globalization has run its course.

On December 4th Italy will vote on a referendum to alter their constitution. If the vote returns a majority for the referendum, it will be a recognition of the Renzi government and a continuation in the EU, if the vote returns a majority against the referendum, the popular Five Star Movement will gain power with a mandate to extricate itself from the EU and reassert the Lira as the nation's currency. Italy is the third largest economy in the EU just behind France. It will signal the death of the EU as every nation, including Britain, flee from the clutches of Brussels and expose globalization for the evil that it is.

Unfortunately, this will cause a worldwide economic meltdown that has long been in the works and only deferred by the massive shell game of debt taking place on a global scale. This may be the beginning of a world war that leaves no nation untouched by the disastrous policies of megalomaniacs. But, if this is the future, it is only a fitting reset to a world gone mad and the alternative is slavery. Let the games begin.

H/T to Zerohedge for THIS article.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

A Mouse of a Man

Barack Obama recently wrote, or rather, dictated an article for The Economist in which were several phony graphs and self-serving statements, the likes of which are just outrageous. (I did not link the article, because if The Economist wants to publish this garbage and you want to read it I have given you enough information to find it.) Of those outrageous statements, this is one: Last year, American households enjoyed the largest income gains on record and the poverty rate fell faster than at any point since the 1960s. Or, this one: [economic] Expectations rise faster than governments can deliver and a pervasive sense of injustice undermines peoples’ faith in the system. Without trust, capitalism and markets cannot continue to deliver the gains they have delivered in the past centuries. In one, he outright lies; in the other he makes the suggestion that government is there to deliver economic expectations and lays the blame for his failures to any significant economic gain on lack of trust in the system.

The article, self-servingly and condescendingly titled "The Way Ahead," is written with all of the dripping narcissism of someone who believes that once he is out of office it will all fall apart unless he leaves this essay on how to conduct the nation in his absence. It is, to a great degree, a chance to simultaneously claim false advances for himself and blame reality on George W. Bush or the Republican Congress as he does here: particularly for infrastructure; and a political system so partisan that previously bipartisan ideas like bridge and airport upgrades are nonstarters. Obama seems to forget that he borrowed a trillion dollars in order to fix our infrastructure with all of the "shovel ready jobs" just waiting for the Stimulus Bill to get passed. But, as has been documented before, most of that money was spent on jobs for union workers or kickbacks to political donors, which, in this case, were one and the same.

Then, there is just the odd insanity like this: Economists have listed many causes for the rise of inequality: technology, education, globalisation, declining unions and a falling minimum wage. For one thing, he can't spell globalization, but prefers the UK spelling just as he does earlier with realization. But the statement itself blames globalization and declining union membership along with a falling minimum wage? I know what he means, that real wages, if stagnant, fall with inflation, but the minimum wage is not falling, real income is falling.

Then, there is this:

The chart is supposed to show how Obama has increased household income for the poorest and reduced household income for the richest. Two problems, one is that it is over the previous year, not the previous decade, not over the past five years, just the past year, therefore an anomoly; Second, if you look at the bottom the sources are from the census bureau and, as he points out earlier in the article HIS Council on Economic Advisors. Therefore, I find the chart highly suspect to begin with. The point is, it shows what he wants you to believe. Later he does the same with a reduction in Carbon gases, but it is more of the same self-serving nonsense that is rife with false claims and phony statistics.

But, what all of this illustrates is that Obama will continue to push this fake legacy of his through the fake news outlets that will still cover Obama like a blanket as long as he breathes. The nation will never be free of his constant self-promotion, unless Trump is able to ridicule him through Twitter and improve the economy faster and better and it drowns out this little mouse of a man.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Plight of the Wounded Behemoth

Is it time to reconsider the Washington press corps? Consider that "media" has changed. The real reporters in today's media are bloggers with special interests who stay tuned to everything that affects them and their world view. They are the investigative press corps of today and have contacts with average Americans on a daily basis, are probably personally and/or professionally involved in the industries and issues about which they write. Never in the history of the world have so many had such access to expose abuses of government (the real purpose of the First Amendment) and industry to the wider public.

The press coverage of the 2016 election has established a solid connection between the Democratic Party and the press. Television, as a news source, has been discredited along with almost every newspaper largely due to their own success. As news organizations grow larger and larger, they also grow more distant from the lives and concerns of their viewers/readers/listeners. They are so large, at this point, that they no longer have to be responsive to both conservatives and liberals in order to survive. They can appeal to just one ideology and remain fiscally sound. But, this has led to the backlash the large media outlets have suffered during the election and beyond.

It seems, then, that President Trump will not be able to effectively transmit his message through a highly biased press corps. When the people cannot trust the press corps to faithfully represent political issues to the public, they serve no purpose to the general public and so should be evaluated on whether or not they serve the purposes of the First Amendment that gives them access to the machinations of government.

It would seem, at this point in time, that some of the "old guard" in the Washington press corps need to leave and others brought in to fill their slots in the "pool" of reporters used when very limited access is possible, such as during treaty negotiations and matters of national security. Now, I have no suggestions as to which "new media" sites might be brought into the press corps, the Drudge Report seems to be one logical candidate and while The Drudge Report might not be considered "neutral" are any of the others?

It is obvious that we need a new understanding of "the news." With the sudden, aggressive attacks on what the bloated, politically-slanted news mega corporations term "fake news" there is a sense of the wounded behemoth lashing out at the mirror. Having largely discredited themselves by their own actions, they now seek victims to blame. Unfortunately for them, the public they have ceased to try and inform have already turned to other, more reliable sources for accurate and complete information necessary for the public to carry out their stewardship of the government, which is its proper role in a functioning republic.

Perhaps it is time for Donald Trump to reconfigure and redefine what passes for a press corps that represents all of America, not just those living on one coast or another. We are a wide and diverse nation that is no longer served by the current configuration of the Washington press corps. Everything has its time and, as history has shown, that time always passes and gives way to the new.

Also, it might be time for NPR, if it wants to retain the portion of its budget that is federally funded, to reconsider its choices of grants and production value of conservative documentaries such as LIES OF OMISSION.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Fake News and How To Fight It

We are at war with the media, but more importantly, they are at war with us. By "we" I mean anyone who believes in the protections of the Constitution, who want to be left alone to live our lives without being constantly assaulted by our own government and the leftists; one group telling us how we are wrong one day and another group telling us how we are wrong the next day. But, all of it is driven by the media. It is the media that brings these issues to the national consciousness, who use the bully pulpit of television, radio and newspapers to beat us into submission. Worse, it is the media that withholds information from us about the government, about the destruction wrought by unfiltered immigration, about the usefulness of guns to reduce crime.

We are getting a warped message and have been for a long time, but it is different now. The media has been exposed as propagandists broadcasting the government line and making up its own news to convince "us" that we are warped and need straightening. It doesn't matter that most of us tuned out long ago. In fact, when the media started propagandizing (something I noticed in the early 80's) it fostered the alternative news that took root with the widespread use of the internet. They are responsible for the "fake news" they now have engaged in an all-out battle. It is "fake news," because it does not get its talking points from the government or special interest groups. Now, they want to censor these "fake news" websites.

The goals of the leftists are these: 1) bring the citizens under surveillance 2) disarm the population 3) propagandize the news 4) silence any opposition 5) execute the opposition. How far along are we? That's how bad we are losing the war. We cannot wait until step 5 to do something about it.

Then, there is the inevitable question: Mr. Davis, what have you done, sir, to stop this propaganda, to take on the media? Huh?

Well, okay, as a plea and an explanation I will say this: myself and CA at WRSA have invested heavily to produce a documentary featuring Mike Vanderboegh, Matt Bracken, Claire Wolfe, but we need help to finish it. There are more interviews to obtain with David Codrea, Larry Pratt and Bill Buppert. It is called Lies of Omission and it interviews these people about freedom, the Second Amendment, what caused them to get involved as liberty activists and this is to directly counter the falsified documentary "Under the Gun" by Katie Couric, for which she had to apologize for the editing practices as it falsely depicted gun owners responses to questions.

But, these things are expensive and we are not rich. We need the help of those who value truth and feel abused by today's media, but there is no money out there for this type of documentary. There is funding for documentaries about the LGBT lifestyle, social justice, green initiatives and every other liberal agenda item, but not for conservative, pro gun documentaries. I have reached out to every conservative organization I can and have gotten little response. So, yes, we need your help to get it done, but trust me, we have spent a lot of money already, so some help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to this post, send out a Tweet about it or put it on Facebook. People who have watched the trailer have helped, but they need to get to the indiegogo or the fundrazr sight to help out.

Thank you for joining the fight.    

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

The Last Betrayal

From the latest statement from the Trump Transition team that Trump might be able to deal on the idea of Global Warming, there is a lack of will to fight the war and it is a war. We are engaged in a social civil war as important and as deadly as any civil war. For the past hundred years or more the collectivists have been engaged in a war against the American culture largely ignored by the culture itself. It is analogous to the Islamist jihadists who had carried on a war against America for decades before the towers came down. 
The collectivists have infiltrated the schools, news organizations, universities, labor unions, local, state and federal governments. Many in the political establishment on both sides have been infiltrated. The fact that so many Republicans have been seduced to the collectivist agenda is a large part of why Donald Trump was elected. This was a result of the great awakening of Middle America, who after the economic meltdown, began to see that the government that was supposed to be defending their interests were, in fact, acting against their interests.

The first evidence of this awakening was the Tea Party movement that swept the nation in response to the massive banking bailouts. While average citizens saw their jobs disappear and their homes repossessed, the bankers were getting huge bonuses granted to them with taxpayer money used to bail them out. It was not in response to the election of Barack Obama as the news continually reported. That is not to say that some of Barack Obama’s policies didn’t aggravate and inspire this movement to new heights, but it did not start the movement. That was fake news propaganda designed to make the Tea Party appear to be racist (the same obnoxious claim the collectivists use at every turn).

Barack Obama represented the collectivists in ways they had never been represented before, in an open and aggressive manner, continually pushing the divisive policies between the individualist instinct and collectivist ideology. After eight years of implementing the collectivist agenda, with little or no opposition from the Republican Party, the whole spectrum of the collectivists from socialists to Marxists had been emboldened enough to wave the Soviet flag at the Democratic National Convention.  

Also, during the same eight years Middle America had been fighting back in the only way they could, electing more and more Republicans to the House and Senate until they had control of both houses, but these Republican collectivists did not have the political will to follow through on their promises. Instead, those same Republicans elected to do that job and that job alone turned around after the 2014 election and told their supporters that they would not engage the president on the issues important to their constituents.  

In a rejection of the Republican Party itself, the citizens of Middle America chose the presidential candidate most unlike the GOP without being a Democrat: Donald Trump. After a lawless and corrupt Obama Administration that ignored immigration law, imported jihadists, protected criminal activity and obstructed justice, Middle America chose the one candidate that promised to enforce immigration law, stop the influx of Syrian refugees that had been infiltrated by Jihadists and bring law and order back to the Attorney General’s office.  

Trump’s campaign offered a ray of hope to an ignored public. The campaign, because it spoke for those long forgotten and defamed, was attacked by the collectivists to a degree that their bias was exposed. Though evidence of their bias had been obvious to those who were paying attention during the Obama Administration, it became glaring during the campaign to install Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office. The collectivists needed Hillary to win bad enough that they dropped the pretense of being impartial reporters of the news and became aggressive propagandists. When Donald Trump won the election, they felt the promise of the collectivist state slip through their fingers and they lost any sense of objectivity.  

The actions of the media; the shock, dismay and even tears was the best thing that could have happened. It was the 9/11 moment for those in Middle America. The protests against Trump, financed by George Soros, the main financial clout behind the collectivist movement, only reinforced the sudden realization of Middle America.  

The collectivist reaction to Trump’s election, because his is not one of the typical Republican establishment’s lap dogs, has been volcanic, even if it is orchestrated and financed. It is a sign that the collectivists, even in the Republican Party, are afraid. But, they have two months to get to him and turn him around. They will spend a lot of time trying to convince him that he doesn’t have to follow through on his promises (they didn't), but just like their prognostications about his demise during the election, they will be wrong. Donald Trump is the last hope for a peaceful transition away from collectivism for the mass of Middle America.  

It is important for Mr. Trump to understand that this is a war. It might be a cold war at this point, but like the Cuban Missile Crisis, it could go nuclear at any moment. Middle America has spent eight years trying to work the political process to their advantage and have been outmaneuvered at every turn, by a corrupt administration willing to do anything to keep the views of Middle America out of the political process. But one might only thwart the intentions of the people so long before open rebellion is the only solution. Middle America will not be able to withstand another betrayal.
Trump must understand that he has the future of this nation in his hands. Now that the collectivists have threatened to secede from the union and Middle America is in a mood to do the same, it is a very tenuous path he treads. If he can be convinced that the only way to save the union is to side with the collectivists, he will destroy it. Perhaps there is no peaceful solution at this point, but if there is, it is only in backing the collectivists down and calling their bluff. It is not betraying the public once again, because that would prove to the many law-abiding, believers in the republic that there is no diplomatic solution and the last act of diplomacy is war.

The one thing that is known about the collectivists is that they will never give up. Death threats to Presidential Electors is just another means of prosecuting their war. Trump was hired to fight back.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

From Darkness To Light

For more than a week the nation has been watching the Trump transition team and the naming of cabinet members. It has been slow, but then, Trump does not have the cronies to repay that a typical president-elect does, nor does he have an apparatus to take from the Bush Administration and install into his own, because the establishment turned its collective backs on Trump early on.

The appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General should send shockwaves through the Obama Administration, because Senator Sessions has always been one to hold others accountable against all headwinds. No one knows the future, but if this nation is ever to regain a semblance of credibility it must go through the darkness to get to the light. The law is the law and it is the law for everyone. If that is not true, and it has not been for a long time, then there is no justice.

Sanctuary cities, illegal immigration, pay for play, obstruction of justice, violation of the First, Second, Third (if violations of the Fourth allow for government surveillance in one's home without warrant or knowledge constitutes troops housed among the people) Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth (think about the IRS), Ninth and Tenth Amendments must be addressed.

After decades of shuffling the Constitution off the books, of shrugging off violations with an understanding that the government has no interest in upholding the Constitution where it protects individuals, but demands compliance where it aids the government, such as the Sixteenth Amendment, shows us how diseased this system has become. With a concerted attempt to turn it around, with appointments like Sessions as Attorney General, Supreme Court Justices who hold the Constitution inviolate, there is a chance to reverse the course of the nation.

No, it is not probable that this will happen. Time and time again the people have elected those they thought would do something on their behalf in Washington, only to have their hopes dashed in the first week. That does not change the fact that we are at a crucial crossroads. The media has been exposed as frauds; Twitter has been exposed as intolerant; the power of the giant electronic media companies like Google face possible anti-trust violations; Obamacare has bankrupted families; "green" boondoggles have cost taxpayers billions with no concrete science behind their claims; political correctness has driven divisions among the people; the education system is dismal and getting worse. Simply a return to Constitutional principles would rectify almost all of these failures of the left.

That is all it would take and if Donald Trump has the will to go through the darkness to get to the light, his presidency will stand as a beacon to future generations. This is what is possible, but indictments will have to be issued and the powerful held to account. This is one reason it is unlikely to take place, but that is what was voted upon in the last election. It was not a vote for Trump as a person, but as an outsider who would prosecute the agenda. A violation of this confidence will likely end with a Democrat in the Oval Office and a rebellion at every level.  

Thursday, November 17, 2016


As Stanley Kowalski says to Blanche Dubois, "We have had this date from the beginning," so does the union. Secession was inevitable and would have been exercised more often had the South won the Civil War. This nation is not conducive to a massive federal government, it never has been and never will be. It was not designed thus and cannot sustain itself as thus. That it has maintained this long as it has is a miracle. I think it would have come unwound during the Obama Administration had it not been evident that the media would have propagandized it as a "racist" movement. But, now the media has been exposed as FAKE news organizations and nothing other than propagandists, so that moniker of "racist" has no affect. It has turned the word into a pejorative and nothing less, with no clout, with no deterrence. One merely shrugs at the indictment, knowing it is nothing less than an epithet, akin to being called a Redneck. Who cares?

The union has had a date with secession from the beginning.  It took nearly 100 years to bring that truth to fruition in the first place and more than 100 years to bring it back around, but it is here. We need to seriously, not emotionally, discuss secession, a realignment of political constructs. There is no reason to take it into the emotional realm. It is a political decision. Metropolitan areas feel differently about liberty than rural areas do. Rural areas do not rely as much on federal subsidies as metro areas do, even though the farm programs make this a close call. But, if the producers of crops were able to charge as they desired, they would get what they are owed and the need for federal subsidies would be negated.

One must understand that while goods and services are provided by metropolitan areas, that is not an exclusive that they can project, while food is a product that can be projected. In other words, a metropolitan area might be able to offer internet access, but that can be offered regardless of a population center, but food has to be grown, harvested and shipped, something a metropolitan area cannot do; oil must be drilled, developed and shipped either through pipelines running through rural areas or over the roads and over railroads.

Oil and other sources of power can be projected toward metropolitan areas, but it cannot be sourced there; it must be imported. That is a power position that Trumpland can exert. What a metropolitan area has to offer is consumers. That is not a good position to be in as a nation. To be a source of consumerism is not a strong position to be in when the providers of those consumables are outside the metropolitan areas. Granted, a product without consumers is a poor trading position, we have to consider need. Who needs and who has. That is the only really important issue here, especially when there are consumers outside the metropolitan areas that equal those in metropolitan areas.

Also, there is the question of security of routes to be considered. After the contract has been signed, there is no guarantee that those supplies will be delivered, if the citizens of the rural areas put up a resistance to the delivery of those supplies. It depends upon the equitable distribution of cash.

Now, keep in mind, those who control such avenues of commerce are expert in negotiation and, well, extortion and bribery. But, they are accustomed to dealing with individuals in positions of power, not random activists doing as they please.

What we have here is a classical Sun Tzu scenario. What are the lines of supply? What is the terrain?  Where is the enemy? Who choses the battlefield? When will the battle be fought? All of these can be dictated by the rural areas.

When you consider that, after the secession, the only place the Blue Nation will control are metropolitan areas, narrow, restricted metropolitan areas surrounded by Red Nation, I mean, if that advantage cannot be exploited, we have no business starting it at all. But, we should and it is time.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Fake News Sites and The Final Solution

With Google's determination to get rid of "fake news" sites, a few questions need to be asked: 1) who is Google to decide what is "fake" and what is not; 2) if Google has the power to take control of a public broadcast system, such as the internet, and manipulate it to enforce its vision of truth, does it not fall under the definition of a monopoly?

Google's arrogance is just one more example of why Donald Trump was elected president in the first place: a good half of the people of this nation do not want "fake" news such as ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times, LA Times, etc. Just because these propaganda outlets exist in the population centers does not mean they speak for the population. Their silence and cover ups of Democrat politicians, "green energy" boondoggles, foreign policy disasters, aiding and abetting terrorist attacks through disguising the actual motivations thereof, failure to alert the nation of the dangers of jihadists infiltrating the refugee program have all lead to disdain and disengagement with these outlets.

Understand there is not one major newspaper; not one major television news outlet (not even Fox); not one movie studio; not one major university; not one television network comedy; not one television network news program that is decidedly pro-conservative, despite the fact that a good half of the population is conservative. All of this goes into the argument and if, with all of that, they still cannot effectively indoctrinate 80-90% of the population, it must be their message alone that is obviously false.

So, what is the definition of a "fake" news site? I would suggest that it is one that cannot gain the support of 90% of the people (because the truth is obvious); that is engaged in a political agenda; that hides certain facts from their audience. All of the conservatives know that there is not one "news" site that tells the truth enough to encourage their readership. The internet is saturated with Yahoo news, Google news, the alphabet networks .com, the major newspapers .com, and still, their lies and distortions drive half the population to other sites to get some balance, to find out what the news IS, because they will never get it from all of the other outlets.

So, what is it? The Drudge Report? The Drudge Report does not write news, it aggregates news from any number of sources. One can read New York Times articles (often only for the purpose of ridicule) on the Drudge Report, but it does not work the other way. One cannot read anything on the Drudge Report in the New York Times, unless it is another liberal rag article.

So, Google news and their ilk have well deserved the title "liberal rag" for specific reasons, because there is no news there, there is only an abundance of propaganda. These fake news sites trade articles and politically motivated headlines, which often do not even accurately depict the content of the article itself.

For whoever was unaware of the politically motivated news from all of these fake news organizations and web sites, the evidence and proof of their bias was totally exposed when they tried desperately to convince the people to elect an unindicted felon for president. Regardless of one's gender, or political affiliation, that should never occur and would not, could not in a legitimate news room.

Now, they are engaged in a cover up and distortion of the news to try to convince the population of the nation that there are organic protests against Donald Trump, forgetting, obviously, that he was just elected President of the United States by millions and millions of voters largely in repudiation of such "fake" news from the aforementioned outlets. That they present these PAID protesters as "angry anti-racists" is laughable when any Craigslist will show you the employment ad and rates of pay. They, having exposed themselves as propagandists, are dedicated to that role and openly encourage division, gleefully encourage destruction of property and perhaps even violent secession, which is, as a broadcast medium, an act of treason. So, they are already in a propaganda war against the red states and the populations thereof.

Now, when it comes to secession, fine. Let's all just divide up into our respective political territories. There is nothing sacred about this "union" as it was designed to ensure the liberty of the people which has, under Democrat or Republican leadership been obliterated. Let's start over, but we don't have to defame and discredit any political figure in order to do that. Let's just decide. Red Nation does not fear secession, in fact, it prefers it as much as the "diaper pinners". Secession is not a threat, so go for it. I will move out of Colorado and into a pro-gun, pro-liberty, anti-terrorism, anti-unregulated immigration, anti-"green" nation and, when the leftist states decide to violate every agreement we have between these new states, war will have to be waged and the final solution realized. Simple.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Blue Island People Want Your Republic

I had called it Blue Nation in the last post, but realized that analogy was wrong, it gave too much credence to the thugs and punks at the protests. Instead, let us consider them the Blue Island people, because they live in little blue islands in the sea of Red Nation. Their numbers are not impressive, because they are enslaved by groupthink and incapable of independent thought. They react as their puppet masters dictate, but I had never considered them a threat to anything but the peace in their own blue island. That is, until a few moments ago.

I do know the Constitution, maybe that is all I know when it comes to politics; the real sewer that it is, but there is something I had hinted at in a post a few days ago that now seems prophetic, except in an opposite way. I had hinted that the electoral college was independent of the popular vote, though some states require that the electors vote as the popular vote dictates, that would be in response to an oath, that we all know by now means absolutely nothing in Washington DC. So, when I read this post by Tom Baugh, h/t WRSA, the words in my recent post came back to me with a bit of nausea. Combine that with this video from Patrick Dollard's site and there is a definite cause for concern, if not outright alarm considering this is coming from a former Attorney General and discount that as much as you want because he was a racist, bigoted, race-baiting Attorney General who never gave a whit about the Constitution, except how to subvert it, he was still the Attorney General, which means this is not an "off-the-cuff" comment, it is a suggestion to the Blue Island people. It is battle space prep. It is subversive, with all of the implications that entails.

So, we see the lines drawn between Red Nation and Blue Island people. We see the former Attorney General suggesting a repeal of the electoral college. The assumption is that a Constitutional Amendment would have to be passed to rid the Constitution of this provision, but if one were corrupt, as most of Washington DC is (do we have to go into how every bank was bailed out, but no borrower was relieved of their obligations during the economic meltdown caused by the banks and government?) there would be no need for a Constitutional Amendment, all there would need to be is a corruption of the electoral college vote to overturn the election.

Understand that Trump is right now being advised of this possibility, this stick, in order to corral him into agreement with the major power brokers in this Corruptocracy. I have written of a line between legitimate government that has been crossed many times and in many ways. But, it has never been so evident, so logical as it seems today. We may never know if Trump is swayed by this confrontation, but we will know if he is not. We will see the electoral college used not to save the union, but to destroy it. Should that eventuality come to pass, that the electors choose not to validate the election of the American people, through traditions that have never been violated, to satisfy the Blue Island people, well, the lines have been drawn, the opposition identified and the justification provided. 

About Me

My photo
I am a published and produced writer, a novelist, a freelance writer, a playwright and blogger.