We are living on the edge of social destruction, a long-planned move of the leftists/Marxists, aided most deftly by the Obama Administration. The arrangements are unmistakable to the critical eye: the silence of the President during periods of race inspired riots as if to lend credibility to the cause; the open statements of the Attorney General supporting the prime actors in the riots; the invitation to the White House of those same actors.
The cause, by the way, is undefined and the actions taken irrational. Theoretically, the cause is the death of a black person, any black person, especially criminals, at the hands of police. So, is this meant to communicate to the rest of the nation that police should not shoot armed criminals based on race? If they should not shoot criminals, what need do they have of weapons? Are those weapons needed just for white people, Latinos, Asians and Native Americans?
The actions taken are to riot and destroy private property, not government property. The rioters, who are incensed by the actions of the police, do not march to the seat of the government; they do not descend on the police station, or the Mayor's Office. These protests are not aimed at the government officials supposedly responsible for the policy of shooting armed criminals. Instead, the rioters loot local stores, destroy cars and attack white people on the streets.
In the light of all of this, Google decides unilaterally (as if they had the right) to declare that blacks cannot be racist against whites. So, some...no, not "some" only one race cannot be racist against a particular race. This is a statement so obviously meant to cover the aggressive and criminal actions of the Black Lives Matter group that one wonders if there has been some extortion worked against Google, or if they are willing to so openly embrace the language of genocide. Because that is what they have done.
Societies are built on a set of common rules that all may embrace. Of course, there are the outliers, the rebels, who challenge those rules and readily accept the social alienation caused by those opinions, but we are involved in something much darker, much more significant than that. These rebels, these neo-racists, have been embraced by every government agency, every media outlet, every corporation out of pure, bone-rattling fear. It is a sort of emotional extortion, they are left to feel good about themselves while they denigrate and destroy the very society they believe they are helping to evolve.
Societies are remarkably fragile things. Undermine the rule of law, destroy a few traditions and focus the ills of a society on a particular race and you have all the makings of a good genocide. Set up a special class of people, in this case Democrats/liberals/leftists, who can do no wrong, cannot be tarnished with the ills of their race, are protected from illegal actions by the government and the media and you have the makings of a good genocide on anyone who is not "them." This is what is in the making. This is why our language must change, why we are not allowed to refer to someone in the traditional manner of Mr or Miss, that is a pillar of the society they want to destroy.
All of the changes we are experiencing are leading up to something. The banking debacle being brewed by Deutsche Bank is just the catalyst that gets the genocide going. I wouldn't imagine anything quite as orderly as the genocide of the Jews in Nazi Germany, I imagine it will be a little more like an American version of Rwanda, where the police and government officials merely take a step back while the slaughter engulfs the nation.