Lies of Omission

Lies of Omission
An Amazing Documentary

Rent Lies of Omission

Lies of Omission for Rent

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Plight of the Wounded Behemoth

Is it time to reconsider the Washington press corps? Consider that "media" has changed. The real reporters in today's media are bloggers with special interests who stay tuned to everything that affects them and their world view. They are the investigative press corps of today and have contacts with average Americans on a daily basis, are probably personally and/or professionally involved in the industries and issues about which they write. Never in the history of the world have so many had such access to expose abuses of government (the real purpose of the First Amendment) and industry to the wider public.

The press coverage of the 2016 election has established a solid connection between the Democratic Party and the press. Television, as a news source, has been discredited along with almost every newspaper largely due to their own success. As news organizations grow larger and larger, they also grow more distant from the lives and concerns of their viewers/readers/listeners. They are so large, at this point, that they no longer have to be responsive to both conservatives and liberals in order to survive. They can appeal to just one ideology and remain fiscally sound. But, this has led to the backlash the large media outlets have suffered during the election and beyond.

It seems, then, that President Trump will not be able to effectively transmit his message through a highly biased press corps. When the people cannot trust the press corps to faithfully represent political issues to the public, they serve no purpose to the general public and so should be evaluated on whether or not they serve the purposes of the First Amendment that gives them access to the machinations of government.

It would seem, at this point in time, that some of the "old guard" in the Washington press corps need to leave and others brought in to fill their slots in the "pool" of reporters used when very limited access is possible, such as during treaty negotiations and matters of national security. Now, I have no suggestions as to which "new media" sites might be brought into the press corps, the Drudge Report seems to be one logical candidate and while The Drudge Report might not be considered "neutral" are any of the others?

It is obvious that we need a new understanding of "the news." With the sudden, aggressive attacks on what the bloated, politically-slanted news mega corporations term "fake news" there is a sense of the wounded behemoth lashing out at the mirror. Having largely discredited themselves by their own actions, they now seek victims to blame. Unfortunately for them, the public they have ceased to try and inform have already turned to other, more reliable sources for accurate and complete information necessary for the public to carry out their stewardship of the government, which is its proper role in a functioning republic.

Perhaps it is time for Donald Trump to reconfigure and redefine what passes for a press corps that represents all of America, not just those living on one coast or another. We are a wide and diverse nation that is no longer served by the current configuration of the Washington press corps. Everything has its time and, as history has shown, that time always passes and gives way to the new.

Also, it might be time for NPR, if it wants to retain the portion of its budget that is federally funded, to reconsider its choices of grants and production value of conservative documentaries such as LIES OF OMISSION.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Fake News and How To Fight It

We are at war with the media, but more importantly, they are at war with us. By "we" I mean anyone who believes in the protections of the Constitution, who want to be left alone to live our lives without being constantly assaulted by our own government and the leftists; one group telling us how we are wrong one day and another group telling us how we are wrong the next day. But, all of it is driven by the media. It is the media that brings these issues to the national consciousness, who use the bully pulpit of television, radio and newspapers to beat us into submission. Worse, it is the media that withholds information from us about the government, about the destruction wrought by unfiltered immigration, about the usefulness of guns to reduce crime.

We are getting a warped message and have been for a long time, but it is different now. The media has been exposed as propagandists broadcasting the government line and making up its own news to convince "us" that we are warped and need straightening. It doesn't matter that most of us tuned out long ago. In fact, when the media started propagandizing (something I noticed in the early 80's) it fostered the alternative news that took root with the widespread use of the internet. They are responsible for the "fake news" they now have engaged in an all-out battle. It is "fake news," because it does not get its talking points from the government or special interest groups. Now, they want to censor these "fake news" websites.

The goals of the leftists are these: 1) bring the citizens under surveillance 2) disarm the population 3) propagandize the news 4) silence any opposition 5) execute the opposition. How far along are we? That's how bad we are losing the war. We cannot wait until step 5 to do something about it.

Then, there is the inevitable question: Mr. Davis, what have you done, sir, to stop this propaganda, to take on the media? Huh?

Well, okay, as a plea and an explanation I will say this: myself and CA at WRSA have invested heavily to produce a documentary featuring Mike Vanderboegh, Matt Bracken, Claire Wolfe, but we need help to finish it. There are more interviews to obtain with David Codrea, Larry Pratt and Bill Buppert. It is called Lies of Omission and it interviews these people about freedom, the Second Amendment, what caused them to get involved as liberty activists and this is to directly counter the falsified documentary "Under the Gun" by Katie Couric, for which she had to apologize for the editing practices as it falsely depicted gun owners responses to questions.

But, these things are expensive and we are not rich. We need the help of those who value truth and feel abused by today's media, but there is no money out there for this type of documentary. There is funding for documentaries about the LGBT lifestyle, social justice, green initiatives and every other liberal agenda item, but not for conservative, pro gun documentaries. I have reached out to every conservative organization I can and have gotten little response. So, yes, we need your help to get it done, but trust me, we have spent a lot of money already, so some help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to this post, send out a Tweet about it or put it on Facebook. People who have watched the trailer have helped, but they need to get to the indiegogo or the fundrazr sight to help out.

Thank you for joining the fight.   

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

The Last Betrayal

From the latest statement from the Trump Transition team that Trump might be able to deal on the idea of Global Warming, there is a lack of will to fight the war and it is a war. We are engaged in a social civil war as important and as deadly as any civil war. For the past hundred years or more the collectivists have been engaged in a war against the American culture largely ignored by the culture itself. It is analogous to the Islamist jihadists who had carried on a war against America for decades before the towers came down. 
The collectivists have infiltrated the schools, news organizations, universities, labor unions, local, state and federal governments. Many in the political establishment on both sides have been infiltrated. The fact that so many Republicans have been seduced to the collectivist agenda is a large part of why Donald Trump was elected. This was a result of the great awakening of Middle America, who after the economic meltdown, began to see that the government that was supposed to be defending their interests were, in fact, acting against their interests.

The first evidence of this awakening was the Tea Party movement that swept the nation in response to the massive banking bailouts. While average citizens saw their jobs disappear and their homes repossessed, the bankers were getting huge bonuses granted to them with taxpayer money used to bail them out. It was not in response to the election of Barack Obama as the news continually reported. That is not to say that some of Barack Obama’s policies didn’t aggravate and inspire this movement to new heights, but it did not start the movement. That was fake news propaganda designed to make the Tea Party appear to be racist (the same obnoxious claim the collectivists use at every turn).

Barack Obama represented the collectivists in ways they had never been represented before, in an open and aggressive manner, continually pushing the divisive policies between the individualist instinct and collectivist ideology. After eight years of implementing the collectivist agenda, with little or no opposition from the Republican Party, the whole spectrum of the collectivists from socialists to Marxists had been emboldened enough to wave the Soviet flag at the Democratic National Convention.  

Also, during the same eight years Middle America had been fighting back in the only way they could, electing more and more Republicans to the House and Senate until they had control of both houses, but these Republican collectivists did not have the political will to follow through on their promises. Instead, those same Republicans elected to do that job and that job alone turned around after the 2014 election and told their supporters that they would not engage the president on the issues important to their constituents.  

In a rejection of the Republican Party itself, the citizens of Middle America chose the presidential candidate most unlike the GOP without being a Democrat: Donald Trump. After a lawless and corrupt Obama Administration that ignored immigration law, imported jihadists, protected criminal activity and obstructed justice, Middle America chose the one candidate that promised to enforce immigration law, stop the influx of Syrian refugees that had been infiltrated by Jihadists and bring law and order back to the Attorney General’s office.  

Trump’s campaign offered a ray of hope to an ignored public. The campaign, because it spoke for those long forgotten and defamed, was attacked by the collectivists to a degree that their bias was exposed. Though evidence of their bias had been obvious to those who were paying attention during the Obama Administration, it became glaring during the campaign to install Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office. The collectivists needed Hillary to win bad enough that they dropped the pretense of being impartial reporters of the news and became aggressive propagandists. When Donald Trump won the election, they felt the promise of the collectivist state slip through their fingers and they lost any sense of objectivity.  

The actions of the media; the shock, dismay and even tears was the best thing that could have happened. It was the 9/11 moment for those in Middle America. The protests against Trump, financed by George Soros, the main financial clout behind the collectivist movement, only reinforced the sudden realization of Middle America.  

The collectivist reaction to Trump’s election, because his is not one of the typical Republican establishment’s lap dogs, has been volcanic, even if it is orchestrated and financed. It is a sign that the collectivists, even in the Republican Party, are afraid. But, they have two months to get to him and turn him around. They will spend a lot of time trying to convince him that he doesn’t have to follow through on his promises (they didn't), but just like their prognostications about his demise during the election, they will be wrong. Donald Trump is the last hope for a peaceful transition away from collectivism for the mass of Middle America.  

It is important for Mr. Trump to understand that this is a war. It might be a cold war at this point, but like the Cuban Missile Crisis, it could go nuclear at any moment. Middle America has spent eight years trying to work the political process to their advantage and have been outmaneuvered at every turn, by a corrupt administration willing to do anything to keep the views of Middle America out of the political process. But one might only thwart the intentions of the people so long before open rebellion is the only solution. Middle America will not be able to withstand another betrayal.
Trump must understand that he has the future of this nation in his hands. Now that the collectivists have threatened to secede from the union and Middle America is in a mood to do the same, it is a very tenuous path he treads. If he can be convinced that the only way to save the union is to side with the collectivists, he will destroy it. Perhaps there is no peaceful solution at this point, but if there is, it is only in backing the collectivists down and calling their bluff. It is not betraying the public once again, because that would prove to the many law-abiding, believers in the republic that there is no diplomatic solution and the last act of diplomacy is war.

The one thing that is known about the collectivists is that they will never give up. Death threats to Presidential Electors is just another means of prosecuting their war. Trump was hired to fight back.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

From Darkness To Light

For more than a week the nation has been watching the Trump transition team and the naming of cabinet members. It has been slow, but then, Trump does not have the cronies to repay that a typical president-elect does, nor does he have an apparatus to take from the Bush Administration and install into his own, because the establishment turned its collective backs on Trump early on.

The appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General should send shockwaves through the Obama Administration, because Senator Sessions has always been one to hold others accountable against all headwinds. No one knows the future, but if this nation is ever to regain a semblance of credibility it must go through the darkness to get to the light. The law is the law and it is the law for everyone. If that is not true, and it has not been for a long time, then there is no justice.

Sanctuary cities, illegal immigration, pay for play, obstruction of justice, violation of the First, Second, Third (if violations of the Fourth allow for government surveillance in one's home without warrant or knowledge constitutes troops housed among the people) Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth (think about the IRS), Ninth and Tenth Amendments must be addressed.

After decades of shuffling the Constitution off the books, of shrugging off violations with an understanding that the government has no interest in upholding the Constitution where it protects individuals, but demands compliance where it aids the government, such as the Sixteenth Amendment, shows us how diseased this system has become. With a concerted attempt to turn it around, with appointments like Sessions as Attorney General, Supreme Court Justices who hold the Constitution inviolate, there is a chance to reverse the course of the nation.

No, it is not probable that this will happen. Time and time again the people have elected those they thought would do something on their behalf in Washington, only to have their hopes dashed in the first week. That does not change the fact that we are at a crucial crossroads. The media has been exposed as frauds; Twitter has been exposed as intolerant; the power of the giant electronic media companies like Google face possible anti-trust violations; Obamacare has bankrupted families; "green" boondoggles have cost taxpayers billions with no concrete science behind their claims; political correctness has driven divisions among the people; the education system is dismal and getting worse. Simply a return to Constitutional principles would rectify almost all of these failures of the left.

That is all it would take and if Donald Trump has the will to go through the darkness to get to the light, his presidency will stand as a beacon to future generations. This is what is possible, but indictments will have to be issued and the powerful held to account. This is one reason it is unlikely to take place, but that is what was voted upon in the last election. It was not a vote for Trump as a person, but as an outsider who would prosecute the agenda. A violation of this confidence will likely end with a Democrat in the Oval Office and a rebellion at every level.  

Thursday, November 17, 2016


As Stanley Kowalski says to Blanche Dubois, "We have had this date from the beginning," so does the union. Secession was inevitable and would have been exercised more often had the South won the Civil War. This nation is not conducive to a massive federal government, it never has been and never will be. It was not designed thus and cannot sustain itself as thus. That it has maintained this long as it has is a miracle. I think it would have come unwound during the Obama Administration had it not been evident that the media would have propagandized it as a "racist" movement. But, now the media has been exposed as FAKE news organizations and nothing other than propagandists, so that moniker of "racist" has no affect. It has turned the word into a pejorative and nothing less, with no clout, with no deterrence. One merely shrugs at the indictment, knowing it is nothing less than an epithet, akin to being called a Redneck. Who cares?

The union has had a date with secession from the beginning.  It took nearly 100 years to bring that truth to fruition in the first place and more than 100 years to bring it back around, but it is here. We need to seriously, not emotionally, discuss secession, a realignment of political constructs. There is no reason to take it into the emotional realm. It is a political decision. Metropolitan areas feel differently about liberty than rural areas do. Rural areas do not rely as much on federal subsidies as metro areas do, even though the farm programs make this a close call. But, if the producers of crops were able to charge as they desired, they would get what they are owed and the need for federal subsidies would be negated.

One must understand that while goods and services are provided by metropolitan areas, that is not an exclusive that they can project, while food is a product that can be projected. In other words, a metropolitan area might be able to offer internet access, but that can be offered regardless of a population center, but food has to be grown, harvested and shipped, something a metropolitan area cannot do; oil must be drilled, developed and shipped either through pipelines running through rural areas or over the roads and over railroads.

Oil and other sources of power can be projected toward metropolitan areas, but it cannot be sourced there; it must be imported. That is a power position that Trumpland can exert. What a metropolitan area has to offer is consumers. That is not a good position to be in as a nation. To be a source of consumerism is not a strong position to be in when the providers of those consumables are outside the metropolitan areas. Granted, a product without consumers is a poor trading position, we have to consider need. Who needs and who has. That is the only really important issue here, especially when there are consumers outside the metropolitan areas that equal those in metropolitan areas.

Also, there is the question of security of routes to be considered. After the contract has been signed, there is no guarantee that those supplies will be delivered, if the citizens of the rural areas put up a resistance to the delivery of those supplies. It depends upon the equitable distribution of cash.

Now, keep in mind, those who control such avenues of commerce are expert in negotiation and, well, extortion and bribery. But, they are accustomed to dealing with individuals in positions of power, not random activists doing as they please.

What we have here is a classical Sun Tzu scenario. What are the lines of supply? What is the terrain?  Where is the enemy? Who choses the battlefield? When will the battle be fought? All of these can be dictated by the rural areas.

When you consider that, after the secession, the only place the Blue Nation will control are metropolitan areas, narrow, restricted metropolitan areas surrounded by Red Nation, I mean, if that advantage cannot be exploited, we have no business starting it at all. But, we should and it is time.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Fake News Sites and The Final Solution

With Google's determination to get rid of "fake news" sites, a few questions need to be asked: 1) who is Google to decide what is "fake" and what is not; 2) if Google has the power to take control of a public broadcast system, such as the internet, and manipulate it to enforce its vision of truth, does it not fall under the definition of a monopoly?

Google's arrogance is just one more example of why Donald Trump was elected president in the first place: a good half of the people of this nation do not want "fake" news such as ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times, LA Times, etc. Just because these propaganda outlets exist in the population centers does not mean they speak for the population. Their silence and cover ups of Democrat politicians, "green energy" boondoggles, foreign policy disasters, aiding and abetting terrorist attacks through disguising the actual motivations thereof, failure to alert the nation of the dangers of jihadists infiltrating the refugee program have all lead to disdain and disengagement with these outlets.

Understand there is not one major newspaper; not one major television news outlet (not even Fox); not one movie studio; not one major university; not one television network comedy; not one television network news program that is decidedly pro-conservative, despite the fact that a good half of the population is conservative. All of this goes into the argument and if, with all of that, they still cannot effectively indoctrinate 80-90% of the population, it must be their message alone that is obviously false.

So, what is the definition of a "fake" news site? I would suggest that it is one that cannot gain the support of 90% of the people (because the truth is obvious); that is engaged in a political agenda; that hides certain facts from their audience. All of the conservatives know that there is not one "news" site that tells the truth enough to encourage their readership. The internet is saturated with Yahoo news, Google news, the alphabet networks .com, the major newspapers .com, and still, their lies and distortions drive half the population to other sites to get some balance, to find out what the news IS, because they will never get it from all of the other outlets.

So, what is it? The Drudge Report? The Drudge Report does not write news, it aggregates news from any number of sources. One can read New York Times articles (often only for the purpose of ridicule) on the Drudge Report, but it does not work the other way. One cannot read anything on the Drudge Report in the New York Times, unless it is another liberal rag article.

So, Google news and their ilk have well deserved the title "liberal rag" for specific reasons, because there is no news there, there is only an abundance of propaganda. These fake news sites trade articles and politically motivated headlines, which often do not even accurately depict the content of the article itself.

For whoever was unaware of the politically motivated news from all of these fake news organizations and web sites, the evidence and proof of their bias was totally exposed when they tried desperately to convince the people to elect an unindicted felon for president. Regardless of one's gender, or political affiliation, that should never occur and would not, could not in a legitimate news room.

Now, they are engaged in a cover up and distortion of the news to try to convince the population of the nation that there are organic protests against Donald Trump, forgetting, obviously, that he was just elected President of the United States by millions and millions of voters largely in repudiation of such "fake" news from the aforementioned outlets. That they present these PAID protesters as "angry anti-racists" is laughable when any Craigslist will show you the employment ad and rates of pay. They, having exposed themselves as propagandists, are dedicated to that role and openly encourage division, gleefully encourage destruction of property and perhaps even violent secession, which is, as a broadcast medium, an act of treason. So, they are already in a propaganda war against the red states and the populations thereof.

Now, when it comes to secession, fine. Let's all just divide up into our respective political territories. There is nothing sacred about this "union" as it was designed to ensure the liberty of the people which has, under Democrat or Republican leadership been obliterated. Let's start over, but we don't have to defame and discredit any political figure in order to do that. Let's just decide. Red Nation does not fear secession, in fact, it prefers it as much as the "diaper pinners". Secession is not a threat, so go for it. I will move out of Colorado and into a pro-gun, pro-liberty, anti-terrorism, anti-unregulated immigration, anti-"green" nation and, when the leftist states decide to violate every agreement we have between these new states, war will have to be waged and the final solution realized. Simple.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Blue Island People Want Your Republic

I had called it Blue Nation in the last post, but realized that analogy was wrong, it gave too much credence to the thugs and punks at the protests. Instead, let us consider them the Blue Island people, because they live in little blue islands in the sea of Red Nation. Their numbers are not impressive, because they are enslaved by groupthink and incapable of independent thought. They react as their puppet masters dictate, but I had never considered them a threat to anything but the peace in their own blue island. That is, until a few moments ago.

I do know the Constitution, maybe that is all I know when it comes to politics; the real sewer that it is, but there is something I had hinted at in a post a few days ago that now seems prophetic, except in an opposite way. I had hinted that the electoral college was independent of the popular vote, though some states require that the electors vote as the popular vote dictates, that would be in response to an oath, that we all know by now means absolutely nothing in Washington DC. So, when I read this post by Tom Baugh, h/t WRSA, the words in my recent post came back to me with a bit of nausea. Combine that with this video from Patrick Dollard's site and there is a definite cause for concern, if not outright alarm considering this is coming from a former Attorney General and discount that as much as you want because he was a racist, bigoted, race-baiting Attorney General who never gave a whit about the Constitution, except how to subvert it, he was still the Attorney General, which means this is not an "off-the-cuff" comment, it is a suggestion to the Blue Island people. It is battle space prep. It is subversive, with all of the implications that entails.

So, we see the lines drawn between Red Nation and Blue Island people. We see the former Attorney General suggesting a repeal of the electoral college. The assumption is that a Constitutional Amendment would have to be passed to rid the Constitution of this provision, but if one were corrupt, as most of Washington DC is (do we have to go into how every bank was bailed out, but no borrower was relieved of their obligations during the economic meltdown caused by the banks and government?) there would be no need for a Constitutional Amendment, all there would need to be is a corruption of the electoral college vote to overturn the election.

Understand that Trump is right now being advised of this possibility, this stick, in order to corral him into agreement with the major power brokers in this Corruptocracy. I have written of a line between legitimate government that has been crossed many times and in many ways. But, it has never been so evident, so logical as it seems today. We may never know if Trump is swayed by this confrontation, but we will know if he is not. We will see the electoral college used not to save the union, but to destroy it. Should that eventuality come to pass, that the electors choose not to validate the election of the American people, through traditions that have never been violated, to satisfy the Blue Island people, well, the lines have been drawn, the opposition identified and the justification provided. 

Blue Nation Protesters

The protesters burning up the heart of Blue Nation are involved in a perfect display of what we must oppose, even if the protests themselves are pathetic and obviously guided by white men with money and encouraged by a traitorous media, but more importantly, not discouraged by the President of the United States. A president that encourages civil unrest and destruction of property has never been worthy of the office.

Blue Nation wants to secede from the union. Members of Blue Nation have threatened to move to Canada, but Canada has officially asked them to stay put. Members of Blue Nation have threatened, via Twitter, to assassinate the President-Elect. This is their character. Yes, Red Nation would have felt much the same had Hillary Clinton been elected, but there was a little matter of placing the nation's most shameless felon in charge of the nation's law enforcement apparatus that led to those feelings. Blue Nation wants to assassinate Donald Trump, because he does not think like they do. Those are some serious differences.

The protesters, who are not even sure why they are protesting, do so at the bidding of the elites. They are the army of the elite. They are the rabble-rousers of millionaires and billionaires, guided in their actions by the lure of money and a bit of fame. They are the minions of powerful media corporations. They are dupes guided by destructionists that are bent on the dismantling of American culture. They use words like racists, misogynists and homophobes, but that is not what they mean, what they mean is: you are not like us, thus you are wrong.

But, the perfect storm is upon them and it may be the end of their run. Which does not mean that the collectivists will not regroup and launch assaults through a different means, but the tactics they have used thus far will be exposed. This is a nation that has been held captive to the liberal dominated media, now discredited by the President-elect. This is a nation that has been held captive to lies about "global warming." The massive amount of commerce that has been denied and restrained by efforts of the Obama Administration are waiting to be unleashed by a President-elect that simply removes the restrictions.

The arguments of the left will have no purchase among those who voted for Trump and who will support him as he makes these changes to government policy. It is a constituency that will be available in 2020, even if they run another black candidate. Over time the lies the Millennials have believed all this time will be disproved and ridiculed by those who suddenly have jobs and futures and money that were denied these things in pursuit of collectivist goals of diminishment and denial.

Then, these protesters and their wealthy instigators will have to find alternate tactics as dangerous and devious as the ones they have employed, but their weapons will be dulled and their lies exposed.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016


Before the media and the leftists figure out how to make the Trump victory, a victory for them through all the traditional means, such as describing how the Trump victory was really a dying last gasp of white racism; or how Trump fed all of the unemployed a false narrative about jobs aplenty; or that the nation under Obama has made Trump's desires inaccessible, let me explain what the Trump victory meant.

It meant that we want a true nation, with borders and to decide who comes in, what they want to do here and how they intend to embrace the formula, which has made this nation successful over the past two hundred plus years. It meant that the majority of us do not want to invest billions of tax dollars into the "green" industry which is only "green" because it takes money from the many and gives to Silicon Valley hucksters. It meant that the majority of us do not agree with government by phone and pen and want and expect our representatives to vote against budget-busting government giveaways to organizations dedicated to the destruction of the middle-class. It meant that the majority of us do not want the government to be at war with its citizens and taxpayers. It meant that the majority of us do not want the Attorney General's office to obstruct justice. It meant that the majority of us do not want Black Lives Matter to have an adjunct office in the Attorney General's office. It means we like the Second Amendment and intend to deny Obama's Supreme Court the opportunity to do more damage to it than they already have.

In essence, the Trump victory simply means that the average American is tired of being belittled, ignored and trampled on by the various special interest groups all claiming that they have somehow been disadvantaged by a system that is based on merit.

Obama's vision of this nation is flawed, but by sheer bully tactics it got its way for eight years, simply because the people of this nation did not want to hold Obama, or his cronies accountable for his inability to govern a diverse people. Instead, they let the first black president do as he pleased, but now recognize Trump as a means of "draining the swamp" of politicians that take advantage of those good intentions. Reparations? We just paid it for eight years. Now, we are even and we want a nation of accountability and fairness to return. We want to return to a nation of people who work hard and need jobs and don't want to be on the government dole. Obama's constituency of "the needy" did not show up for him, because he was not on the ballot and the good people of this nation had absolved themselves of their sins by tolerating his brand of government corruption. Obamacare? Tried it and didn't like it. Open borders? Tried it and didn't like it. Importing terrorists? Tried it and didn't like it. Giving Iran billions of dollars to foster and encourage worldwide terrorism? Tried it and didn't like it.

The Trump victory is not a repudiation of blackness or brownness or Islam. It is a repudiation of self-annihilation through embracement of those qualities alone. Obama viewed blackness and brownness and Islam as a means of destroying whiteness and Christianness. Trump's victory is a repudiation of that method of reconstructing the nation.

The United States of America is an open society, welcoming of any shade of color or religious fervor, but it is expected that entrance to the bounty of America comes with a corresponding respect for the values and methods by which, for over two hundred years, it has built the society capable of that bounty. It is not a nation to be plundered by those who enter, but bolstered by those who enter and as the creators of the bounty (black, white, brown and whatever other color is associated with people) we have the right and the obligation to protect it by choosing those who enter for their potential ability to build upon that which has been laid as a foundation.

Obama's method of governance was to destroy that which made this nation wealthy and prosperous by allowing the plunderers special access to the bounty. Repudiation of that method of governance is what a Trump victory meant.

One Night Of Peace

Sometimes one spends so much time dreading the lawlessness of government, recognizing the level of destitution, fiscal and legal, that it represents, that somewhere the alternative fails to register on the mind. This is the condition I find myself tonight. Donald Trump was elected President of the United States and whatever might come is hard to decipher, except that at least I know he believes in America and the people who live all across the nation who stood up for him and the rule of law.

Democratic pundits have been spending every second with veiled threats and recriminations. They are stunned. They felt that the illegal votes would put them over the threshold, but they didn't. There are still many, many people in this nation who recognized a chance to defeat the criminal enterprise that threatened this nation and they gave the presidency to Donald Trump.

What we have to fear is the tantrum to be thrown by the current resident of that office. That I can imagine his defiant refusal to give up the office without doing inestimable damage to it is a stain in and of itself. I have had eight years to witness his childish reactions to disobedience to think any better of him. So, we wait to see what his reaction will be, how much damage he is able to inflict? His choice as a Supreme Court justice just went out the window.

But, I also look forward to the power of commerce that might be unleashed. I don't know what metamorphosis might take place between tonight and January 20, but one thing I do think Trump knows how to do and that is to get the American commercial engine reignited. Hopefully, he will be true to his word and rid us of this "green" economy that has, in fact, stalled and hindered all proven means of production. I would hope for a reduction of regulations on business and a restructuring of the IRS, but perhaps that is a wish too many.

There are some smart things he could do without too much effort that would do a great deal for industry and I believe he will do those things, but make no mistake, it is not government I want from him and it was not more government that all of those people came out to vote for him want.

In short, if he would just take the brakes off and stop punishing the producers of this nation, that would be enough.

Trump is not the answer to anything. He not a solution. He is a respite at best. All of the important things are still in place. All of the violations of rights and the surveillance government continue. The media is still hates most of those who voted for him. His ability to select a good Supreme Court justice is still in question. We have been given a few more months to prep and train and learn. He cannot solve the debt issues, or the fact that we still have enemies.

We are in a lot of trouble, but for tonight I can sleep without the knowledge that Clinton will bring her corrupt and evil plans to the Oval Office. One night of peace, I suppose and worry about the rest tomorrow.

Sunday, November 6, 2016

No Legitimacy, No Peace

Okay folks, you have seen the circus, it is time to decide whether you are an American or a subject of corruption and, with tail neatly between legs, are willing to accept masters who act like Roman Emperors, casting bread to the peasants, who are too weak and too timid to do a dang thing about it. Yes, I am talking to law enforcement, too.

Is this it? The President calling for illegals to VOTE? Is that who we are willing to be? Are we too scared to do something about this lawless cabal occupying the highest seats of our government and make no mistake, whatever government we have allowed to exist is OUR government.

I have heard no outrage from the Republicans about this disenfranchisement of the tax-paying, uniform-wearing, producers of wealth in this nation. Nothing. No word. No outrage, no denouncement, no pronouncement that the House and Senate will take this encouragement of electioneering and invalidation of the vote to task once the Congress reconvenes. This is betrayal and treason on a grand scale.

I hold, that no matter what has gone on in the past, a single, tax-paying voter who is disenfranchised by an illegal vote is an act of invasion, it is an act of aggression against the American citizen. It is actionable. It is indefensible.

For the longest time, I have hesitated to make such drastic and seemingly (even to me) desperate and hysterical statements, but every once in a while some events transpire to encourage even the level-headed and rational to reject this assault on everything this nation was designed to be; everything held dear by a liberty-loving populace. That there are Democrats who continue to stand behind their candidate, when few Republicans would, is a signal that despite illegality, our fellow citizens are willing to destroy all that America is supposed to mean in order to simply "win."

Win what? Win against other Americans? Win against the rule of law? Win against legitimacy of government? Win against proper governance? A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for the rule of the jungle, the rule of might over right and if that is the intent, is it not our duty (us conservatives, who do not participate in vote-rigging, election tampering, or disenfranchisement of our fellow citizens) to bring forth our troops to deny this tactic of denial of the public intent?

It is one thing to have an election go against one's interests, to turn out in a disappointing fashion, it is another to watch the very heart of the republic carved out by traitors with no regard for laws or legitimate elections. Any election that is not legitimate, i.e., when legal votes are diluted by the votes of those who are dead, no longer live in the district, or are not even legal residents of the nation, or district in which they cast votes, there is no legitimate election at all and no legal government can come from such an election.

In that event that a President encourages illegal voting, as we have today, facing us on Tuesday, then we no longer have a legal government, not a legal federal government, not a legal state government, not a legal city government and any action intent on overthrowing that illegitimate government is not an act of treason, but an act of patriotism. One cannot be guilty of insurgency against an illegal government imposed by an illegal vote.

I am not calling for an overthrow of the legitimate government, I merely expect that when a government is recognized as no longer valid due to the actions of those highest in office, it is the duty of the patriot to rectify that error.

We can be comfortable in our assessment that should the Democratic Party candidate win the election that it is by no means legitimate, but the result of the dead, the dispossessed and the illegal votes cast that that outcome is foisted upon our great nation and our great system to deny the rightful and legal citizens the outcome that should rightfully have been theirs. It is democracy denied. It is treason.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

These Are The Times

These are the times for which the Constitution was written; this is why there is an impeachment clause; this is why there is legislative oversight of the executive branch; this is why there is an electoral college. Elections are important to the legitimacy of government officials. Where there is no confidence in the election process, there is the electoral college, but all of these clauses and instruments require a core of integrity.

The electoral college is to keep the public from voting for tyrants and criminals who have a slick campaign strategy. The electoral college was designed to put cooler, more rational heads to use when deciding an election, at the time it was assumed that they would exert the power of the electoral college to protect the union. The electors are representatives of the people and of the union normally bound to vote the way the people of their state voted, but also to recognize where that vote would be to the detriment of the union.

This election presents us with the head of a criminal organization, a person who has already used her office of Secretary of State to solicit donations to her family's foundation, theoretically in exchange for access to the Secretary of State in policy issues. Hillary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI for allowing access by foreign nations to state secrets by utilizing an unsecure email server that she would be able to control and unavailable to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Hillary Clinton is also under investigation by the FBI for engaging in a pay-for-play scheme involving the Clinton Foundation as mentioned above. The Clinton Foundation is also under investigation by the FBI in connection with the actions of Hillary and Bill Clinton. Ties to the Clinton campaign have been (self-admittedly) engaged in vote rigging and encouraging illegal voting and inciting riots at Clinton's political opponent's rallies. There has been collusion between the Department of Justice and the Clinton campaign.

This is exactly where the electoral college is designed to step into the fray and deny this person the office of the President of the United States to preserve the integrity of the union.

But, that will never happen. The necessary ingredient for anything in the Constitution to be valid is integrity and it is obvious by the actions of the Attorney General, the former Secretary of State, the President of the United States and aides and allies of same that integrity of government is the last expectation one should have. It is a lawless cabal occupying the highest levels of government.

In the coming days, whether Trump is elected or not, but especially if he is, Barack Obama will be issuing pardons like Halloween candy. Hundreds of people are complicit in the crimes of the Clinton Foundation, the Department of Justice and the Office of the Secretary of State and President's office, including the President himself.

Don't look for action by the Republican Party. If there is anything that has been better documented in the past eight years than the absolute lack of accountability, the lack of political resolve, by the Republican House and Senate, I don't know what that would be.

With no anticipation of any means to rid the nation of this corruption, it becomes the duty of the people to act in defense of the union or to abolish it and establish new government that is more likely to ensure their safety. (reworded from the original)

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Resign and Reveal

No indictments? How many different criminal acts have to under investigation by the FBI before it gains the effect of critical mass and an indictment comes down for perjury, or destruction of evidence, or obstruction of justice, or conspiracy to obstruct justice? What about RICO? By this stage there is evidence galore of the Clinton Foundation falling afoul of the RICO Act. As Guiliani said tonight, he could have gotten an indictment on a fraction of what the FBI has now and may have had back in July.

As critical as I am of the FBI at times, when they act like the thugs they are supposed to be putting in jail, I also believe that there are some good, decent men and women in the ranks who look at the piling evidence and recognize that their bureau is being painted with the same brush as the Clinton Foundation. Frankly, they look a little "bought off" not so much by money as by the promise of retirement and continued employment, some pretty persuasive inducements themselves.

There has been some information alluded to at True Pundit that many high-ranking officials including the Clintons, Abedin, Weiner and a few senators and representatives along with staff members taking part in child molestation. I have no concrete evidence of this charge, just the story at True Pundit, but I had heard rumors of the same earlier. While I have no independent information confirming this story, is this what it takes? Something of this magnitude? Why would none of the other information be enough to warrant an indictment? The system is this broken, that it takes some disgusting charge of child porn to finally put a stake through the heart of the beast?

So, assuming that the story at True Pundit is NOT accurate, but some dirty tricks being played in the last week of the campaign, let's look at what is known and ask why that is not enough already? DOJ colluding with the Clinton campaign, DOJ obstruction of justice for irrationally refusing to empanel a grand jury for crimes of racketeering for which there is ample evidence, perjury, destruction of evidence, etc etc. Why is that not enough?

Of course, we understand corrupt government officials. There is just too much power in the hands of  fallible human beings for there not to be some to take advantage of an opportunity, so we know it exists, but we always feel like if it comes to light there will be indictments regardless of political status. Now we find that political status does outweigh justice. And, not in a little, fudging sort of way, but in a way that makes it possible for someone to run a criminal organization out of the Secretary of State's office, and when caught, the offender is able to keep the presidential campaign on track...ON TRACK, with media support, with cover from the president himself using distraction and obfuscation to aid the campaign.

Good God, is there no point at which the DOJ is shamed into an indictment? If not, then what role can the FBI play in establishing a little justice in the Department of Justice? Or, is that it? No pledge to the Constitution can weigh on the conscience of these FBI agents? Resign and reveal, go to prison if you have to (you might be acquitted by the jury). You know, there are some in Benghazi who gave more than that trying to serve the country that made freedom possible. Or, is it better that all of the citizens suffer under the absolute tyranny of criminal officials to save your pension?

Think of all of the scandals surrounding the Clintons, from Bill's election of governor until this very moment and it is absolutely staggering and their imperviousness to conviction has fueled it all, because where there is no accountability the criminals are emboldened and the abuses multiplied.  Think of the future; anything that is not ultimately rectified is sanctioned. Unless all of the FBI agents are corrupt they cannot allow the behavior of the Clintons and their accomplices go unaddressed. It will completely undermine the image of the Bureau, perhaps for generations.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

More Than Arrogance

Forget Trump, he is not the issue, because the issue is bigger than the election that is driving it. There is only one true candidate in this election and it is called accountable government and a vote for Hillary is a vote against accountable government.

Just over the email scandal the Attorney General of the United States, one of the most important offices in the government as it pertains to individuals, has demonstrated a lack of integrity by taking a meeting with Bill Clinton, the husband of the would be defendant, at a Phoenix airport. The next day, James Comey Director of the FBI, a direct subordinate of the Attorney General, obstructed justice by ignoring obvious felonies committed by Hillary Clinton, the logical result of his testimony would have been to refer the case to a U.S. Attorney, or the Attorney General, but by failing to do so, Director Comey became complicit in obstruction of justice.  

Next, the Attorney General obstructed justice by nixing an investigation of the Clinton Foundation. These are impeachable acts, to which the Congress of the United States is complicit by failure to initiate impeachment proceedings. When crimes against the people have been committed, it is the responsibility of law enforcement officers and members of Congress to act. When they do not act, they place the nation in danger.

What no one seems to be interested in is the fact that an injustice must be addressed, especially at the highest levels. The entire justice system of the United States is based on that very principle. What is the purpose of arresting a common thief? It is not so much punishment, as it is to prevent future thefts, to remove such people from society.

Whereas one thief might burglarize hundreds of homes if not taken off the street, an Attorney General failing to enforce the law affects the entire nation. It places, or leaves criminals in control of whole sections of the government and, in this case, perhaps the entire law enforcement apparatus of the nation.

Where does it stop? What can stop it? It has to stop with the people, but even that is being corrupted by illegal votes and rigged voting machines; the importation and encouragement of illegal immigrants to vote. This is so the people of the country, with the most to lose, who understand the importance of having an accountable government, have less and less of a say in addressing the corruption. This is a nice little racket they have going, isn't it?

Corruption at the very highest levels of government protected by the highest levels of law enforcement, unaddressed by the highest levels of the people's representatives, unable to be addressed by the people themselves, whose numbers have been diluted by illegal actions of the highest levels of law enforcement. It is circular national suicide. For them, winning seems to be the only desirable outcome, but for us, who have to live under the corrupt system, it is intolerable. Their actions are more than arrogant and more than avaricious, they are treasonous. At some point that reality has to take hold.

This truth is only made that much more depressing to think that there are about 45% of the people in this nation who will openly and even enthusiastically vote to support and sustain this corrupt, illegal and treasonous system. They are the Democratic drones. You know what a drone is, right, a mindless machine that is operated remotely by someone much more intelligent than they are.  

About Me

My photo
I am a published and produced writer, a novelist, a freelance writer, a playwright and blogger.