Lies of Omission

Lies of Omission
An Amazing Documentary

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Sometimes, You Have To Fight

We are at war. Just because there are not fire fights in the streets does not mean that a war is not raging all around us. This is a cultural war, a globalist vs nationalist conflict, but the resistance to that depiction does not change a single thing. Many do not want to be labeled "nationalist" and they don't believe "globalist" is the right term either. But, like any math problem, the terms need to be defined down to their essence and then the problem can be worked. It is this lack of distillation that has kept everyone in their respective corners for so long.

I would describe myself as an individualist. I claim the territory of myself and willingly suffer the consequences of my actions, enough to turn myself in, even. I believe in personal responsibility. I undertake nothing that I have not figured the consequences into the equation. Now, I suspect that speaks for a lot of us, but it is not an ideology; principled perhaps, but not actionable. The whole idea is to be left alone and for that sort of society to work, the vast majority of the people would have to subscribe to it and no greater crime could be committed than to evade capture or lie to avoid the punishment for one's actions. But, in this war, that makes me a sucker, a victim, a fool, because the enemy believes in none of this. This is what makes it a war, because one culture cannot survive in the presence of the other, like matter and anti-matter. Oceans are good for keeping them separate.

A lot of attention is now given to the threat from Islam and many European nations are suffering from the lack of ocean separateness, but that is not the primary threat to our culture, that is coming from the Marxists in our institutions. It is the long war that has now co-opted Islam and globalism into the fight. The foe remains totalitarianism, but labeling it globalism is easier to identify, especially when placed in proximity to nationalism. So, neither definition is accurate, but it never is. It is the weakness of the individualist that they are often intransigent and will not fight until their boar is gored. Sometimes, you just have to fight the evil for whatever reason you can devise.

The challenge is to overcome decency to defend decency. The Constitution worked for about six weeks, until everyone started trying to get what they thought they were going to get out of it. The Supreme Court took upon itself the right to "define" it. No one had claimed that territory and so they did, to give them purpose. Now, there is no need for a Constitutional Amendment when the courts can rule what is and is not permissible. It undermines the entire Constitution. It allows for the government to make rules for itself, thereby destroying the whole concept of the Constitution as written. The government, what people call "the deep state," the bureaucracy, the government service level, who do not leave when a new president is elected, or a new congress seated, or a new Supreme Court seated, are actively working against any control the people might have to limit its power or protect their rights. They are on the side of the globalists, whether they consider themselves as such, or not.

This is the danger of a large federal government and why the Constitution was written to leave most powers with the states, excepting international powers to make treaties with other nations, which is why dealing with the Indian nations were included in their power and not the states.

This is a declaration of war and it started the minute an unruly, uncompromised man was elected president, before the inauguration, when it became apparent that he might restrain government power and relinquish some of it to the people. Now, who knows how long this illusion will last? How long before they find a way to co-opt him? But, this is a war, they have moved against their enemy and all that is left is for the nationalists, or whatever, to decide to fight back. Maybe a few more boars will have to get gored, first, but that does not change the fact that the war has begun, it only determines when it will be engaged.

Barack Obama and his shadow government might attempt a coup, nothing would be better than that, because the danger is that there is no unified understanding of when to respond and so all of the individualists wander about waiting for their moment, when they understand the conflict and know who to engage to counter it.

The one thing that is not generally discussed however is: what comes next? The Constitution has been a failure and maybe it took a while to recognize that fact, but there it is. The question actually comes down to what would one fight for, recognizing that putting the genie back in the bottle is not going to happen. Any Constitutional convention now would not look anything like the one in 1787. It would be a rabble, a mob, with protests in the streets and SJW's flocking the corridors. It would start the next revolution. In that sense, I might encourage it. That might make one think that I want a war, with all of the horrors turned to glory, but I assure you that is not the case. The undeniable fact is that war has begun. That will not change if I sit home on my couch, it will just make it that much easier for my enemies to win. So, yes, it is time to engage the enemy, because they have been engaging us for a hundred years.


  1. You might want to peruse this article:

    Here's the money quote:

    "Obama’s goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment."

    IF EVER there was a "get off the porch moment" this has to be it...

  2. an addendum to my previous comment above -

    18 US Code 2384

    If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

    1. "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"

      are we still the united states anymore?

    2. No, we are not. This is a post-Constitutional entity. Enforcement is at the point of the gun and right now, they are pointed at us.

    3. Trump needs to be the Agressor. Let the warrants fly!

    4. I would suggest that removing Trump by means of impeachment or resignation doesn't meet the "force" requirement of the cited law, but it certainly does put a stake in the ground politically.

    5. I would say the US Code listed above applies to Obama and his minions. It is your move Mr. Sessions!

    6. In August of 2009 I was the plaintiff in a Federal jury trial. The trial was because local county government had me removed from a public meeting for daring to challenge their lawbreaking. I sued them for 1st Amendment violations. I won. Unanimous jury in my favor. But, not so fast. The countygov appealed to their "brotha", the Federal judge. He overturned the jury verdict that was in both my favor and that of the dead US Constitution.

      For me....every stinking fedgov judge deserves a rope around their neck. Every one.

      The Constitution is long dead. I learned that early 8 years ago.

    7. the constitution is not a failure. ppl are a failure. the constitution is not a failure, ppl are a failure. there is potential fight you suggest. what happens after that? the constitution is one of the most significant documents ever. the constitution is not a failure. ppl are. ie: your judge failed the country and you. the constitution although dead (I agree w/ you), can be revived. yes, that is an enormous undertaking but so was WWII. and other events.

  3. If you have not read this yet, I highly recommend it as it goes right along with this excellent post.

  4. Ths ia another good breakdown of the obozo trying to remaian relevant.

  5. I think the bar fight analogy is apropos here. Once the fists start flying, it doesn't really matter in the larger sense the little differences and whether you thought your friend should have hit on that guy's girl or not, it becomes a binary equation. Hit the guy swinging at you more and harder than he hits you. The statists have weaponized identitarian politics to the point where there are irreconcilable differences between neighbors, family members and people groups. We are now at the level of bar fight politics and somebody is going to hit on the wrong girl or look at someone the wrong way. It's only a matter of time. I don't like it, but it doesn't change the perception of the majority of Americans that a rather large segment wants to strip them of money, rights and influence. Whether true or not, people are past the point of being convinced through facts and it's the awkward moment before the fighting begins but past the point of verbal communication.

    1. Well-said and well-put (as usual) Mr. Jesse. We're here--we've got your back!

      More importantly--we've got one another!

      When the fur starts flying, we will give bttern we get!

    2. Excellent analogy, and much like a real fight some will swing, many will head for the exits. I will stand and swing til my last breath. I would do no less were I defending my children's lives. Come to think of it, we are.

    3. Thing about it is though guys you have to be in the same bar which would mean the same AO to have each other's back...Which is why advocate for what I do... Until we can look each other in the eye and see how people hold up in the good as well as the bad then we will all swing separately...I wish more people understood that...

  6. Decency/ Constitutional law/ libertarian principles all only work if everyone agrees with them. Those who do not agree and instead try to subvert for their own purposes have to be recognized as pathogens infecting the body politic. Like any pathogen, they need to be destroyed by any means necessary.

  7. Read: American Betrayal by Diana West

    Secret Team by J.Fletcher Prouty

    Stalins Secret Agents by M.Stanton Evans and Herbert Romerstein

  8. Trump being ousted in a coup would signal/start what exactly? I have all but given up on any ideas that "patriots" will stand up and do anything except debate the same old dead horses on WRSA. After all these years we are just as much a disorganized small minority of people who will not work together because of small differences of opinion. This is where the "left" beats us so badly. They ALL will work together whether they believe the same exact things or not while we vow to frag each other once the shooting begins.

    The fact is that unless small communities, counties maybe mount resistance that there will be none. States? I won't hold my breath.

    TL, you tried brother. We failed you and all your efforts. The reality though is that no matter what happens in Washington, we will just take it. Oh we will grumble and wave our soon to be illegal ARs but we won't do shit. That's the facts.


    1. I believe the rise of City States with like minded people and like minded goals would mushroom into county wide then regional and finally statewide affirmation!
      Sadly, this will BE after the bloodbath when the Survivors attempt to salvage OUR Republic!

    2. 55six, while in some ways I share your frustration; it has been my experience that there are many folks who think, feel, believe, and see things the way we do. Some I've spoken with are even more 'intent' than the WRSA commentariat. And, as will be a surprise to OfA/Obama (OfA=Obama fucks America) - these angry folks are a cross section of America; more diverse than just 'old white guys with ARs and keyboards".
      And I believe they (OfA) are just foolish enough to have to learn this hard lesson, the hard way.
      Time is short. Indeed, "a time is coming, and now is..."
      Be blessed and safe, y'all. We've got a fight coming.
      - Grandpa

    3. Community is where it's going to be at...If we are surrounded by those who are likeminded and prepared as we are we will have a much better shot of coming through the storm intact and able to rebuild what fell apart like was mentioned...

    4. Amen, brother. Wasn't our agreement on that point years ago, the idea that sparked the fellowship we have now? I may be senile, but I believe it was... I'll be north soon, my friend.
      - Grandpa

  9. "Sometimes you have to fight." YES,it would seem to be never ending. Yet we are not to grumble nor complain.
    "This is a cultural war." Yes, and so much more.
    A Christian mercenary should connect and understand the spiritual side.
    " The enemy has been engaging us for 100 years.No,it has been far longer than 100 years.
    These calls to ."harden one's heart" is the call of fear,the call of the world. Hardening of one's heart is the opposite of what Yahusha has called us to do.
    There is a time spoken of in the Bible when Elohim(God) will harden the hearts of men. Men who are off course.

  10. the constitution is not a failure. ppl are a failure. the constitution is not a failure, ppl are a failure. there is potential fight you suggest. what happens after that? the constitution is one of the most significant documents ever. the constitution is not a failure. ppl are.

  11. Offensive Actions on every Front: Middlebury College professor injured by protesters as she escorted controversial speaker

  12. The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

    For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

    Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."


  13. "what comes next?"

    If we're lucky, Panarchy. Let every person be subject to the polity he advocates, and hands off the others. Let's see which can retain its supporters (I suspect Marxism won't last long if the Marxists actually have to live it).

    Maybe the Constitution can be fixed; there will be a polity for that. Maybe anarchy is the ticket; there will be a polity for that. Maybe simple familiar modern conservatism or liberalism will be most popular; there will be polities for those too.

    The problem is not that liberals think differently from conservatives, but that each seeks to impose on the other. When that stops (like it did with religious imposition 200 years ago), people will live in peace. Until the next thing worth fighting over, anyway.

  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

  16. In this morning's news sweep I saw this and immediate thought of this entry and the comments here.

  17. exactly how is Trump uncompromised??

  18. Carnival Barker Trump

    To say that watching people fawn over the carnival barker Trump makes me nauseous with despair is putting it mildly.

    So, who said the following? I’ll give you forty-seven guesses:

    1) “I probably identify more as Democrat.”

    2) “I’ve been around for a long time. And it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans.”

    3) “Nancy — you’re the best. Congrats. [signature]”
    —Handwritten note to Speaker Nancy Pelosi

    4) “Bush is probably the worst president in the history of the United States.”

    5) “I’m totally pro-choice.”

    6) “I want to see the abortion issue removed from politics. I believe it is a personal decision that should be left to the women and their doctors.”

    7) “I’m very liberal when it comes to health care. I believe in universal health care.”

    8) “The Canadian plan also helps Canadians live longer and healthier than Americans… We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan.”

    9) “By imposing a one-time 14.25 percent net-worth tax on the richest individuals and trusts, we can put America on sound financial footing for the next century.”

    10) “I think he [Obama] has a chance to go down as a great president.”

    Stumped? I’ll give you a hint. This person has donated over $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation, and Hillary Clinton sat in the FRONT ROW of this person’s most recent wedding.

    So here’s the answer. All of the quotes above are from the second coming of George Washington, or Constantine – oh, no wait. The second coming of Constantine is Putin…


  19. You said, "The Constitution has been a failure and maybe it took a while to recognize that fact, but there it is." This is true. But imho it is because we didn't force politicians, and those in positions of authority to adhere to it.

  20. The constitution was not a failure. The people failed.
    Capitalism was not the failure, people failed.
    i could go on.

  21. Very helpful suggestions that help in the optimizing website.
    thank for sharing the link.

    gclub online


About Me

My photo
I am a published and produced writer, a novelist, a freelance writer, a playwright and blogger.